...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endovascular therapy: an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists >Emergency abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with a preferential endovascular strategy: mortality and cost-effectiveness analysis.
【24h】

Emergency abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with a preferential endovascular strategy: mortality and cost-effectiveness analysis.

机译:优先采用腔内策略紧急修复腹主动脉瘤:死亡率和成本效益分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To assess mortality and treatment costs of a new management protocol with preferential use of emergency endovascular aneurysm repair (eEVAR) for acute abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). METHODS: From September 2003 until February 2005, 49 consecutive patients (45 men; mean age 71 years) with acute AAA were entered into a prospective study of a new management protocol that featured preferential use of eEVAR (n=18); patients with unsuitable anatomy or who were hemodynamically unstable underwent open repair (n=31). Mortality data and costs of treatment were compared in this mixed prospective group to a historical control group consisting of 147 patients (128 men; mean age 71 years) who underwent open repair from January 1998 to December 2001. All direct medical costs were included from the moment of admission until discharge from the hospital. RESULTS: Mortality in the mixed prospective group (18%) was lower than in the historical control group (31%), but the difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.099). The mean total cost in the mixed prospective group was 17,164 euro compared to 21,084 euro in the historical open repair group (p=0.255). CONCLUSION: A preferential eEVAR protocol for acute AAA can decrease mortality and does not increase overall costs during initial treatment, but larger studies are needed to determine if these trends are statistically significant.
机译:目的:通过优先使用急诊血管内动脉瘤修复术(eEVAR)来治疗急性腹主动脉瘤(AAA)来评估新管理方案的死亡率和治疗费用。方法:从2003年9月至2005年2月,连续49例急性AAA患者(45名男性,平均年龄71岁)被纳入一项以eEVAR优先使用为特征的新治疗方案的前瞻性研究(n = 18)。解剖结构不当或血液动力学不稳定的患者接受了开放式修补(n = 31)。比较该混合前瞻性组的病死率数据和治疗费用,并与1998年1月至2001年12月接受开放修复的147例患者(128例男性,平均年龄71岁)组成的历史对照组进行比较。所有直接医疗费用均包括在内。入院直至出院的那一刻。结果:混合前瞻性组的死亡率(18%)低于历史对照组(31%),但差异没有统计学意义(p = 0.099)。混合预期组的平均总成本为17,164欧元,而历史性开放维修组的平均总成本为21,084欧元(p = 0.255)。结论:针对急性AAA的优先eEVAR方案可以降低死亡率,并且在初始治疗期间不会增加总成本,但是还需要进行更大的研究才能确定这些趋势是否具有统计学意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号