...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endourology >Laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy versus conventional laparoscopic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
【24h】

Laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy versus conventional laparoscopic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

机译:腹腔镜单点肾上腺切除术与常规腹腔镜手术:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose: To assess the surgical efficacy and potential advantages of laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy (LESS-AD) compared with conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy (CL-AD) based on published literature. Methods: An online systematic search in electronic databasesM including Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, as well as manual bibliography searches were performed. All studies that compared LESS-AD with CL-AD were included. The outcome measures were the patient demographics, tumor size, blood loss, operative time, time to resumption of oral intake, hospital stay, postoperative pain, cosmesis satisfaction score, rates of complication, conversion, and transfusion. A meta-analysis of the results was conducted. Results: A total of 443 patients were included: 171 patients in the LESS-AD group and 272 patients in the CL-AD group (nine studies). There was no significant difference between the two groups in any of the demographic parameters expect for lesion size (age: P=0.24; sex: P=0.35; body mass index: P=0.79; laterality: P=0.76; size: P=0.002). There was no significant difference in estimated blood loss, time to oral intake resumption, and length of stay between the two groups. The LESS-AD patients had a significantly lower postoperative visual analog pain score compared with the CL-AD group, but a longer operative time was noted. Both groups had a comparable cosmetic satisfaction score. The two groups had a comparable rate of complication, conversion, and transfusion. Conclusions: In early experience, LESS-AD appears to be a safe and feasible alternative to its conventional laparoscopic counterpart with decreased postoperative pain noted, albeit with a longer operative time. As a promising and emerging minimally invasive technique, however, the current evidence has not verified other potential advantages (ie, cosmesis, recovery time, convalescence, port-related complications, etc.) of LESS-AD.
机译:目的:根据已发表的文献,与传统的腹腔镜肾上腺切除术(CL-AD)相比,评估腹腔镜内窥镜单点肾上腺切除术(LESS-AD)的手术疗效和潜在优势。方法:在包括Pubmed,Embase和Cochrane库在内的电子数据库中进行在线系统搜索,并进行手工书目搜索。包括所有将LESS-AD与CL-AD进行比较的研究。结果指标是患者的人口统计资料,肿瘤大小,失血量,手术时间,恢复口服摄入的时间,住院时间,术后疼痛,美容满意度得分,并发症发生率,转化率和输血。对结果进行荟萃分析。结果:共纳入443例患者:LESS-AD组为171例,CL-AD组为272例(九项研究)。两组在预期病变大小的任何人口统计学参数上均无显着差异(年龄:P = 0.24;性别:P = 0.35;体重指数:P = 0.79;侧卧度:P = 0.76;大小:P = 0.002)。两组之间的估计失血量,恢复口服摄入的时间以及住院时间没有显着差异。与CL-AD组相比,LESS-AD患者的术后视觉类似物疼痛评分显着降低,但手术时间更长。两组的美容满意度得分均相当。两组的并发症,转化和输血率相当。结论:在早期经验中,LESS-AD似乎是其常规腹腔镜手术替代品的安全可行的替代方法,尽管术后时间更长,但术后疼痛减轻。然而,作为一种有前途的新兴微创技术,目前的证据尚未证实LESS-AD的其他潜在优势(即美容,恢复时间,恢复期,与口相关的并发症等)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号