首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endourology >Forced versus minimal intravenous hydration in the management of acute renal colic: a randomized trial.
【24h】

Forced versus minimal intravenous hydration in the management of acute renal colic: a randomized trial.

机译:急性肾绞痛的治疗中强制性静脉补液与最小剂量静脉补液:一项随机试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The management of acute renal colic is a problem commonly encountered by both urologists and emergency medicine physicians. The classic approach to managing uncomplicated acute renal colic involves hydration, along with imaging and pain control. Previous studies have suggested that hydration has a significant impact on patient comfort, as well as spontaneous stone passage. This study evaluated the effects of maintenance v forced hydration and its effect on the pain experienced from renal colic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty male and 18 female patients with a mean age of 41 years suspected to have acute renal colic were identified in the emergency department. After screening and informed consent, the patients were enrolled in the study, and 43 patients were eventually available for analysis. Patients received intravenous (IV) analgesia, imaging with a noncontrast CT scan of abdomen and pelvis, and assignment to either forced IV hydration with 2 L of normal saline over 2 hours (N = 20) or minimal IV hydration at 20 mL of normal saline per hour (N = 23). A visual analog pain scale was completed hourly for a total of 4 hours. Demographic information, laboratory and imaging results, narcotic use in morphine equivalents (ME), and pain scores were recorded and compared. Spontaneous stone passage rates were also calculated by careful patient follow-up. Results were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Stone size was equivalent in the two treatment groups (p > 0.05). There was no difference in the narcotic requirement in ME (p = 0.644) between the two groups. Similarly, there was no difference in hourly pain score or stone-passage rates between the groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of uncomplicated renal colic has traditionally included vigorous intravenous hydration, as well as medications for the control of pain and nausea. Our data suggest that maintenance intravenous fluids are as efficacious as forced hydration with regard to patient pain perception and narcotic use. Moreover, it appears the state of hydration has little impact on stone passage.
机译:背景与目的:急性肾绞痛的治疗是泌尿科医师和急诊医学医师普遍遇到的问题。处理简单的急性肾绞痛的经典方法包括水合作用,以及影像学和疼痛控制。先前的研究表明,水合作用对患者的舒适度以及自发性结石通过有重大影响。这项研究评估了维持水合强制水合作用的效果及其对肾绞痛引起的疼痛的影响。患者和方法:在急诊科中确定了40名平均年龄41岁的男性和18名女性患者,他们被怀疑患有急性肾绞痛。经过筛查和知情同意后,将患者纳入研究,最终有43位患者可以进行分析。患者接受静脉(IV)镇痛,腹部和骨盆CT对比成像,在2小时内用2 L生理盐水(N = 20)进行强制IV水合或在20 mL生理盐水中进行最低IV水合每小时(N = 23)。每小时完成一次视觉模拟疼痛量表,共计4个小时。记录并比较人口统计信息,实验室和影像学结果,吗啡当量(ME)中的麻醉剂使用以及疼痛评分。还通过仔细的患者随访来计算自发结石通过率。在p <0.05时,结果被认为具有统计学意义。结果:两个治疗组的结石大小均相等(p> 0.05)。两组间ME的麻醉要求无差异(p = 0.644)。同样,两组之间的每小时疼痛评分或结石通过率也无差异(p> 0.05)。结论:传统上,简单的肾绞痛的治疗包括剧烈的静脉水合作用,以及用于控制疼痛和恶心的药物。我们的数据表明,就患者的疼痛感和麻醉性使用而言,维持静脉输液与强制水合作用一样有效。而且,看来水合状态对石通道的影响很小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号