首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endourology >Oncologic assessment of hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy for urothelial tumors of the upper tract: comparison with conventional open nephroureterectomy.
【24h】

Oncologic assessment of hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy for urothelial tumors of the upper tract: comparison with conventional open nephroureterectomy.

机译:手辅助腹腔镜肾癌肾切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮肿瘤的肿瘤学评估:与常规开放性肾癌切除术的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate the oncologic results of our operative technique, hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy (HRNU), for the treatment of upper-tract urothelial cancer, various perioperative parameters and oncologic outcomes were compared for HRNU and conventional open nephroureterectomy (CONU). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients with clinical stage T(1,2)N(0)M(0) renal-pelvic and ureteral tumors underwent HRNU. A retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy was carried out with hand assistance via a lower-abdominal midline incision. The lower ureter was resected by open surgery through the same incision, and the operative specimen was extracted via the same incision. Thirty-seven cases of CONU were reviewed as historical controls. Various perioperative and parameters and oncologic results were compared for the two procedures. RESULTS: The HRNU was completed in all but one case, which was converted to CONU. The mean operating time (395 minutes) was longer than that for CONU (289 minutes), and the mean estimated blood loss with HRNU (497 g) was greater than that with CONU (296 g). The mean time to oral intake (1.4 days) was shorter than that after CONU (2.3 days), and the mean time to walking was shorter (2.1 days v 2.6 days). There were no statistical differences in the cause-specific survival rate, the disease-free survival rate, or the bladder recurrence-free survival rate between HRNU (median follow-up 23 months) and CONU (median follow-up 56 months). CONCLUSION: The HRNU, a combination of endoscopic and conventional open surgery, seems to be a reasonable surgical procedure, because the lower-abdominal incision can be utilized, not only as a route for hand assistance, but also as a window for open surgery when resecting the distal ureter as well as for extraction of surgical specimens. The procedure is a safe alternative to conventional open surgery for upper urinary-tract tumors from an oncologic viewpoint.
机译:目的:为了评估我们的手术技术的手法,腹腔镜肾癌后肾切除术(HRNU)的肿瘤学效果,用于治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌,比较了HRNU和常规开腹肾切除术(CONU)的各种围手术期参数和肿瘤学结局。患者与方法:36例临床分期为T(1,2)N(0)M(0)肾盂和输尿管肿瘤的患者接受了HRNU治疗。腹腔镜下肾切除术是通过下腹部中线切口在手辅助下进行的。通过相同的切口通过开放手术切除下输尿管,并通过相同的切口取出手术标本。回顾了37例CONU病例作为历史对照。比较了两种手术的各种围手术期,参数和肿瘤学结果。结果:除一例外,HRNU均已完成,已转换为CONU。平均手术时间(395分钟)比CONU(289分钟)更长,并且HRNU(497 g)的平均估计失血量大于CONU(296 g)。平均口服时间(1.4天)比CONU术后(2.3天)要短,平均步行时间要短(2.1天比2.6天)。在HRNU(中位随访23个月)和CONU(中位随访56个月)之间,原因特异性生存率,无病生存率或膀胱无复发生存率无统计学差异。结论:内镜和常规开放手术相结合的HRNU似乎是一种合理的手术方法,因为下腹部切口不仅可以用作手部辅助手术的途径,而且还可以作为开放手术的窗口切除远端输尿管以及提取手术标本。从肿瘤学的角度来看,该手术是常规的开放手术治疗上尿路肿瘤的一种安全替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号