...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endourology >Retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract cancer: a comparative study with conventional open retroperitoneal nephroureterectomy.
【24h】

Retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract cancer: a comparative study with conventional open retroperitoneal nephroureterectomy.

机译:腹腔镜肾上腺切除术治疗上尿路癌:与常规开放式腹膜后肾切除术的比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy (RNU) with those of open retroperitoneal nephroureterectomy (ORNU) for upper urinary tract cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 240 consecutive patients who received a clinical diagnosis of localized upper urinary tract cancer and underwent nephroureterectomy by a retroperitoneal approach. Of these, 120 patients underwent RNU and 120 patients underwent ORNU. RESULTS: The mean operative time for RNU (346 min) was significantly longer than that for ONU (209 min), despite the lack of a significant difference in the estimated blood loss between these two groups. Significant differences were observed in parameters related to postoperative recovery between the groups, including the time to walk (1.8 versus 2.3 days), the time to oral intake (1.8 versus 2.7 days), and the time until permission for discharge (9.9 versus 13.4 days). There were no significant differences in the major pathologic factors between the groups. Furthermore, the incidences of intravesical as well as extravesical recurrence between the RNU and ORNU groups were similar, and there were no significant differences in cause-specific and overall survivals between the groups. Among patients with grade 3 disease, cause-specific survivals in patients undergoing RNU were significantly poorer than those in patients undergoing ORNU, while there was no significant difference in the overall survival between the groups. Multivariate analysis, however, indicated that the surgical procedure (RNU versus ORNU) could not be an independent predictor of both overall and cancer-specific survivals irrespective of tumor grade. CONCLUSIONS: RNU represents an effective, safe, and less invasive management option for upper urinary tract cancer and achieves a cancer control rate similar to that of ORNU; however, it is necessary to perform further investigations to determine the optimal indications for RNU for patients with high-grade disease.
机译:目的:比较腹膜后肾切除术(RNU)与开放性腹膜后肾切除术(ORNU)治疗上尿路癌的结果。患者与方法:本研究包括240位连续患者,这些患者接受了局部上尿路癌的临床诊断,并通过腹膜后方法行了肾结石切除术。其中120例接受RNU,120例接受ORNU。结果:尽管两组之间的估计失血量没有显着差异,但RNU的平均手术时间(346分钟)比ONU的平均手术时间(209分钟)长得多。两组之间与术后恢复有关的参数存在显着差异,包括行走时间(1.8天对2.3天),口服摄入时间(1.8天对2.7天)以及直至出院的时间(9.9天对13.4天) )。两组之间的主要病理因素无显着差异。此外,RNU和ORNU组之间的膀胱内和膀胱外复发的发生率相似,并且各组之间因病因和总体生存率无显着差异。在患有3级疾病的患者中,接受RNU的患者因特定原因的存活率显着低于接受ORNU的患者,而两组之间的总体存活率无显着差异。但是,多变量分析表明,无论肿瘤的级别如何,手术程序(RNU与ORNU)都不能独立地预测整体生存和癌症特异性生存。结论:RNU是上尿路癌的一种有效,安全且侵入性较小的治疗选择,其癌症控制率与ORNU相似。然而,有必要进行进一步的研究以确定对于高病患者RNU的最佳适应症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号