首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endourology >Comparison of clinical outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in patients with radiopaque v radiolucent ureteral calculi.
【24h】

Comparison of clinical outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in patients with radiopaque v radiolucent ureteral calculi.

机译:不透射线v透亮输尿管结石患者体外冲击波碎石术的临床结局比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) in patients with radiopaque and radiolucent ureteral calculi. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between September 2001 and August 2002, a total of 113 consecutive patients with ureteral calculi (58 radiopaque [Group 1], 55 radiolucent [Group 2]) were treated with a Multimed 2001 trade mark lithotripter under fluoroscopic monitoring. Localization of radiolucent stones was achieved after a bolus injection of contrast medium 1 mL/kg, the shockwaves being focused just below the end of contrast column. All patients were treated on an outpatient basis under analgesia and light sedation if required. The mean follow-up was 14 (range 6-23) months. Patients were reevaluated by some combination of plain films, ultrasound scanning, and intravenous urography 3 months after the treatment. Groups were compared with ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U tests. A P value <0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in any parameter between groups. At 3 months, the success rate (stone-free status) was 87.9% in Group 1 and 89% in Group 2 (P = 0.848). Double-J catheter replacement was needed for three patients in Group 1 and for two patients in Group 2 (P = 0.693). Two patients from Group 1 and three from Group 2 underwent intracorporeal lithotripsy with ureterorenoscopy (P = 0.606). No adverse reactions to contrast medium occurred in Group 2. CONCLUSION: Patients with radiolucent ureteral calculi can be treated efficiently with SWL by contrast medium injection if ultrasonic localization is not possible.
机译:目的:比较体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)在不透射线和不透射线输尿管结石患者中的疗效。患者与方法:2001年9月至2002年8月,在荧光镜下对Multimed 2001商标碎石仪治疗的连续113例输尿管结石患者(58例不透射线[组1],55例不透射线[组2])进行了治疗。大剂量注射1 mL / kg造影剂后,射线可透性结石得以定位,冲击波聚焦在造影剂柱的正下方。所有患者均根据需要在镇痛和轻度镇静下接受门诊治疗。平均随访时间为14(6-23岁)个月。治疗后3个月,通过平片,超声扫描和静脉泌尿造影对患者进行了重新评估。将各组与ANOVA和Mann-Whitney U检验进行比较。 P <0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:各组之间的任何参数均无统计学上的显着差异。在3个月时,第1组的成功率(无结石状态)为87.9%,第2组的成功率为89%(P = 0.848)。第1组中的3例患者和第2组中的2例患者需要双J导管更换(P = 0.693)。第1组的2例患者和第2组的3例患者接受了输尿管镜检查的体内碎石术(P = 0.606)。在第2组中未发生对造影剂的不良反应。结论:如果不可能进行超声定位,则可以通过造影剂注射用SWL有效治疗不透射线输尿管结石患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号