...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Econometrics >Alternative models for stock price dynamics
【24h】

Alternative models for stock price dynamics

机译:股票价格动态的替代模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper evaluates the role of various volatility specifications, such as multiple stochastic volatility (SV) factors and jump components, in appropriate modeling of equity return distributions. We use estimation technology that facilitates nonnested model comparisons and use a long data set which provides rich information about the conditional and unconditional distribution of returns. We consider two broad families of models: (1) the multifactor loglinear family, and (2) the affine-jump family.Both classes of models have attracted much attention in the derivatives and econometrics literatures. There are various tradeoffs in considering such diverse specifications. If pure diffusion SV models are chosen over jump diffusions, it has important implications for hedging strategies. If logarithmic models are chosen over affine ones, it may seriously complicate option pricing. Comparing many different specifications of pure diffusion multifactor models and jump diffusion models, we find that (1) log linear models have to be extended to two factors with feedback in the mean reverting factor, (2) alline models have to have a jump in returns, stochastic volatility or probably both. Models (1) and (2) arc obscrvationally equivalent on the data set inhand. In either (1) or (2) the key is that the volatility can move violently. As we obtain models with comparable empirical fit, one must make a choice based on arguments other than statistical goodness-of-fit criteria. The considerations include facility to price options, to hedge and parsimony. The affine specification with jumps in volatility might therefore be preferred because of the closed-form derivatives prices.
机译:本文评估了各种波动率指标在适当的股本收益率分布建模中的作用,例如多个随机波动率(SV)因素和跳跃成分。我们使用有助于简化非嵌套模型比较的估算技术,并使用一个长数据集,该数据集提供有关收益的有条件和无条件分布的丰富信息。我们考虑了两个广泛的模型族:(1)多对数对数线性族和(2)仿射跳跃族。这两类模型在导数和计量经济学文献中引起了广泛关注。考虑这种不同的规格时,需要进行各种折衷。如果选择纯扩散SV模型而非跳跃扩散,则对套期保值策略具有重要意义。如果选择对数模型而不是仿射模型,则可能会使期权定价严重复杂化。比较纯扩散多因素模型和跳跃扩散模型的许多不同规格,我们发现(1)对数线性模型必须扩展到两个因子,且均值回复因子具有反馈;(2)Alline模型的收益必须跳跃,随机波动或两者兼而有之。模型(1)和(2)在手头的数据集上令人费解。在(1)或(2)中,关键是波动性可能剧烈波动。当我们获得具有可比的经验拟合的模型时,就必须根据统计拟合优度标准以外的论据做出选择。考虑因素包括价格选择权,对冲和简约。由于封闭形式的衍生工具价格,因此可能会首选具有波动性的仿射规范。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号