首页> 外文期刊>Clinical therapeutics >A comparison of three questionnaire-based measures of analgesic use over 11 years in adult males: a retrospective analysis of data from a prospective, population-based cohort study.
【24h】

A comparison of three questionnaire-based measures of analgesic use over 11 years in adult males: a retrospective analysis of data from a prospective, population-based cohort study.

机译:比较三种基于问卷调查的成年男性11年内的镇痛效果:一项前瞻性,基于人群的队列研究数据的回顾性分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Few data are available on whether 3 commonly used, yet slightly different, questionnaire-based measures assessing the use of analgesics provide congruent and comparable results. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare 3 different measures of analgesic use in 1 study population over an 11-year period. METHODS: Data for this study were gathered from a prospective, population-based cohort study in which 3 different measures were applied simultaneously for measuring use of analgesics at baseline, 4 years, and 11 years. The first measure was "weekly analgesic use in general," the second measure "analgesic use for pain symptoms within the past week," and the third measure "giving the name of any analgesic used within the past week." The subjects were Finnish men who completed 11 years of follow-up in the Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Factor (KIHD) Study, conducted at the Research Institute of Public Health, University of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland. Agreement between the 3 different measures was determined by Kappa statistics. RESULTS: A total of 829 men completed 11 years of follow-up (mean [SD] age, 51.4 [6.7] years at baseline; 62.4 [6.5] at study end). At baseline, the prevalence of weekly analgesic use varied from 12.3% to 17.4% and at 11 years from 16.5% to 25.9%, depending on which measure was being used. The third measure yielded the highest prevalence at all 3 points of time and the lowest was obtained using the first measure. The Kappa agreement between the 3 measures at the 3 time points varied from moderate (0.37) to good (0.71). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the measure being used influences the obtained prevalence of analgesic use. All 3 measures tested consistently throughout the course of the study. The best results, with regard to determining prevalence, were obtained by asking the respondents to name the medicines they had been using during the previous week.
机译:背景:很少有数据可以评估基于3种常用但略有不同的基于镇痛药的问卷调查方法是否能提供一致且可比较的结果。目的:本研究的目的是比较11年期间1个研究人群中3种不同的镇痛剂使用方法。方法:本研究的数据来自于一项基于人群的前瞻性队列研究,其中在基线,4年和11年同时应用了3种不同的方法来测量止痛药的使用。第一项措施是“一般每周使用镇痛药”,第二项措施是“在过去一周内使用止痛药镇痛”,第三项措施是“给出过去一周内使用的任何镇痛药的名称”。受试者为芬兰男子,他们完成了在Kuopio大学(芬兰Kuopio)公共卫生研究所进行的Kuopio缺血性心脏病危险因素(KIHD)研究的11年随访。 Kappa统计数据确定了这三种不同措施之间的一致性。结果:总共829名男性完成了11年的随访(平均[SD]年龄,基线时为51.4 [6.7]岁;研究结束时为62.4 [6.5]岁)。在基线时,每周使用镇痛剂的患病率从12.3%到17.4%不等,而在11年时,每周使用镇痛剂的患病率从16.5%到25.9%不等,这取决于所使用的措施。第三项措施在所有三个时间点的患病率最高,而使用第一项措施的患病率最低。 3个指标在3个时间点之间的Kappa协议从中等(0.37)到良好(0.71)不等。结论:这项研究的结果表明所使用的措施会影响获得的止痛药使用率。在整个研究过程中,所有3个指标均得到一致测试。在确定患病率方面,最好的结果是让受访者说出他们在前一周使用的药物的名字。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号