...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Chemistry: Journal of the American Association for Clinical Chemists >Fasting versus nonfasting triglycerides and the prediction of cardiovascular risk: do we need to revisit the oral triglyceride tolerance test?
【24h】

Fasting versus nonfasting triglycerides and the prediction of cardiovascular risk: do we need to revisit the oral triglyceride tolerance test?

机译:空腹与非空腹甘油三酸酯及心血管风险的预测:我们是否需要重新进行口服甘油三酸酯耐受性测试?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Historically, triglycerides have been measured in the fasting state for 2 reasons. First, because of the marked increase in triglycerides after fat ingestion, the variability in triglyceride measurements is much smaller in the fasting state. Second, before the availability of direct assays for LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), estimation of LDL-C was performed in clinical practice almost exclusively by use of the Friedewald equation, which requires that both the HDL-C concentration and the fasting triglyceride concentration divided by 5 be subtracted from the total cholesterol concentration.
机译:历史上,出于两个原因,已经在禁食状态下测量了甘油三酸酯。首先,由于脂肪摄入后甘油三酸酯的显着增加,因此在空腹状态下甘油三酸酯测量的变异性要小得多。其次,在可以直接检测LDL胆固醇(LDL-C)之前,在临床实践中几乎完全通过使用Friedewald方程来估算LDL-C,这需要HDL-C浓度和空腹甘油三酸酯浓度从总胆固醇浓度中减去5。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号