...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Economics >Lender deception as a response to moral hazard
【24h】

Lender deception as a response to moral hazard

机译:贷款人欺骗是对道德风险的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The paper considers a principal-agent relationship between a borrower and lender based on a model from Bowles (Microeconomics: behavior, institutions, & evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2003). It expands the model by incorporating borrower collateral as an exogenous variable to partly assuage lender concerns about excessive risk, and a theory of lender deception is then developed. Deception is posited as a costly activity that effectively makes fraud undetectable and extracts the borrower's economic rent arising from moral hazard despite the presence of third-party enforcement and borrower collateral. We identify under what conditions a lender may have sufficient incentives for employing deception and to what extent they would employ it. The likelihood of, and outcomes from, deception are compared between monopoly lenders those in competitive markets. The model suggests that competitive lenders have more incentive to deceive than a monopoly lender facing the same borrower.
机译:本文基于鲍尔斯的模型(微观经济学:行为,制度和演进,普林斯顿大学出版社,普林斯顿,2003年)来考虑借款人与贷方之间的委托代理关系。它通过将借款人抵押品作为外生变量纳入模型来扩展模型,以部分缓解放贷人对过度风险的担忧,然后发展出放贷人欺骗的理论。欺骗被认为是一项代价高昂的活动,尽管存在第三方执法和借款人抵押品,但欺骗活动实际上使欺诈行为无法被发现,并从道德风险中提取了借款人的经济租金。我们确定贷款人在什么条件下可能有足够的诱因采取欺骗手段,以及在何种程度上采用欺骗手段。比较竞争市场中的垄断贷方的欺骗可能性和欺骗结果。该模型表明,竞争性贷方比面对同一借款人的垄断贷方更有诱骗动机。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号