首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dentistry >Evaluation of the marginal integrity of ceramic copings with different marginal angles using two different CAD/CAM systems.
【24h】

Evaluation of the marginal integrity of ceramic copings with different marginal angles using two different CAD/CAM systems.

机译:使用两个不同的CAD / CAM系统评估不同边角的陶瓷顶盖的边缘完整性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To investigate and compare the marginal integrity of ceramic copings constructed with the CEREC3 and the EVEREST system employing three different margin angle designs and explore to what extent these CAD/CAM machines can produce acute marginal angles creating restorations with acceptable margins. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three brass models were prepared with a different marginal finish line, namely a 0 degrees bevel (or 90 degrees shoulder), a 30 degrees bevel and a 60 degrees bevel. Ten restorations were produced for each finishing line and CAD/CAM system, respectively. The copings were milled from lithium disilicate glass ceramic blocks (IPS e.max((R)) CAD). An impression was taken for each model to fabricate a series of 10 replica dies for each marginal design. Quantitative analysis of the margins of each coping was performed using digital photography and image analysis software. The marginal integrity of the restorations was evaluated by detecting and measuring any signs of marginal chipping and the Chipping Factor (CF) was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using Univariate Analysis of Variance and multiple comparisons (Tukey HSD). RESULTS: The average Chipping Factor (CF) of the CEREC copings was: 2.8% for the 0 degrees bevel angle, 3.5% for the 30 degrees bevel angle and 10% for the 60 degrees bevel angle. For the EVEREST copings the average CF was: 0.6% for the 0 degrees bevel angle, 3.2% for the 30 degrees bevel angle and 2.0% for the 60 degrees bevel angle. Univariate Analysis of Variance and multiple comparisons showed that there was a statistically significant difference in the quality of margins between the two systems for the 0 degrees and 60 degrees bevel finishing line. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicated that the introduction of a marginal angle of the restoration increases the potential for marginal chipping. Different CAD/CAM systems which employ different milling processes produce restorations with different amount of marginal chipping, although this only became apparent for a marginal angle of a 60 degrees .
机译:目的:研究并比较采用三种不同边缘角设计的CEREC3和EVEREST系统构造的陶瓷顶盖的边缘完整性,并探讨这些CAD / CAM机器在多大程度上可以产生锐利的边缘角,从而创建可接受边缘的修复体。材料和方法:准备了三种黄铜模型,它们具有不同的边缘精加工线,即0度斜角(或90度肩部),30度斜角和60度斜角。每个精整线和CAD / CAM系统分别制作了十个修复体。由二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷块(IPS e.max(R)CAD)研磨帽盖。每个模型都有一个印象,每个边缘设计制造了一系列10个复制模具。使用数码摄影和图像分析软件对每次处理的边缘进行定量分析。通过检测和测量边缘碎裂的任何迹象来评估修复体的边缘完整性,并计算碎裂因子(CF)。使用单变量方差分析和多重比较(Tukey HSD)进行统计分析。结果:CEREC顶盖的平均切屑因数(CF)为:0度斜角为2.8%,30度斜角为3.5%,60度斜角为10%。对于EVEREST顶盖,平均CF为:0度斜角为0.6%,30度斜角为3.2%,60度斜角为2.0%。方差的单变量分析和多次比较显示,对于0度和60度斜角精加工线,两个系统之间的边距质量在统计上有显着差异。结论:这项研究的结果表明,修复体的边缘角的引入增加了边缘崩裂的可能性。采用不同铣削工艺的不同CAD / CAM系统产生的修复体具有不同数量的边缘碎屑,尽管这仅在60度的边缘角时才变得明显。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号