...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dentistry >Interfacial fracture toughness of different resin cements bonded to a lithium disilicate glass ceramic
【24h】

Interfacial fracture toughness of different resin cements bonded to a lithium disilicate glass ceramic

机译:粘合到二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷上的不同树脂胶粘剂的界面断裂韧性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of HF acid etching and silane treatment on the interfacial fracture toughness of a self-adhesive and two conventional resin-based cements bonded to a lithium disilicate glass ceramic. Methods: Lithium disilicate glass ceramic discs were prepared with two different surface preparations consisting of gritblasted with aluminium oxide, and gritblasted and etched with hydrofluoric acid. Ceramic surfaces with a chevron shaped circular hole were treated by an optimized silane treatment followed by an unfilled resin and then three different resin cements (Variolink II, Panavia F2, and Multilink Sprint). Specimens were kept in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h and then subjected to thermocycling. The interfacial fracture toughness was measured and mode of failures was also examined. Data were analysed using analysis of variance followed by T-test analysis. Results: No statistically significant difference in the mean fracture toughness values between the gritblasted and gritblasted and etched surfaces for Variolink II resin cement was found (P > 0.05). For the gritblasted ceramic surfaces, no significant difference in the mean fracture toughness values between Panavia F2 and Variolink II was observed (P > 0.05). For the gritblasted and etched ceramic surfaces, a significantly higher fracture toughness for Panavia F2 than the other cements was found (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The interfacial fracture toughness for the lithium disilicate glass ceramic system was affected by the surface treatment and the type of luting agent. Dual-cured resin cements demonstrated a better bonding efficacy to the lithium disilicate glass ceramic compared to the self-adhesive resin cement. Clinical significance: The lithium disilicate glass ceramic surfaces should be gritblasted and etched to get the best bond when used with Panavia F2 and Multilink Sprint resin cements, whereas for the Variolink II only gritblasting is required. The best bond overall is achieved with Panavia F2.
机译:目的:评估氢氟酸蚀刻和硅烷处理对粘合到二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷的自粘和两种常规树脂基水泥的界面断裂韧性的影响。方法:用两种不同的表面处理方法制备二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷圆盘,包括氧化铝喷砂,喷砂和氢氟酸蚀刻。通过优化的硅烷处理,然后填充未填充的树脂,然后使用三种不同的树脂胶粘剂(Variolink II,Panavia F2和Multilink Sprint),对具有人字形圆形孔的陶瓷表面进行了处理。将样品在37°C的蒸馏水中保存24小时,然后进行热循环。测量了界面断裂韧性并检查了破坏模式。使用方差分析,然后进行T检验分析来分析数据。结果:对于Variolink II树脂水泥,喷砂处理,喷砂处理和蚀刻表面之间的平均断裂韧性值无统计学差异(P> 0.05)。对于喷砂陶瓷表面,在Panavia F2和Variolink II之间没有发现平均断裂韧性值的显着差异(P> 0.05)。对于喷砂和蚀刻的陶瓷表面,发现Panavia F2的断裂韧性明显高于其他水泥(P <0.05)。结论:二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷体系的界面断裂韧性受表面处理和浸润剂类型的影响。与自粘树脂胶泥相比,双固化树脂胶泥显示出对二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷更好的粘合效果。临床意义:与Panavia F2和Multilink Sprint树脂水泥一起使用时,应对二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷表面进行喷砂处理和蚀刻以获得最佳粘合,而对于Variolink II,仅需喷砂处理。 Panavia F2可以实现最佳的粘合效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号