...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of applied microbiology >Comparison of pattern recognition techniques for the identification of lactic acid bacteria
【24h】

Comparison of pattern recognition techniques for the identification of lactic acid bacteria

机译:模式识别技术识别乳酸菌的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Aims: The goal of this study was to evaluate three pattern recognition methods for use in the identification of lactic acid bacteria. Methods and Results: Lactic acid bacteria (21 unknown isolates and 30 well-characterized strains), including the Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Streptococcus, Pediococcus and Oenococcus genera, were tested for 49 phenotypic responses (acid production on carbon sources). The results were scored in several ways. Three procedures, k-nearest neighbour analysis (KNN), k-means clustering and fuzzy c-means clustering (FCM), were applied to the data. Conclusions: k-Nearest neighbour analysis performed better with five-point-scaled than with binary data, indicating that intermediate values are helpful to classification. k-Means clustering performed slightly better than KNN and was best with fuzzified data. The best overall results were obtained with FCM. Genus level classification was best with FCM using an exponent of 1.25. Significance and Impact of the Study: The three pattern recognition methods offer some advantages over other approaches to organism classification.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估用于识别乳酸菌的三种模式识别方法。方法和结果:测试了乳酸菌(21种未知菌株和30个特征明确的菌株),包括乳酸菌,乳球菌,链球菌,Pecococcus和Oenococcus属,进行了49种表型反应(碳源上产酸)。对结果进行了多种评分。将k-最近邻分析(KNN),k-均值聚类和模糊c-均值聚类(FCM)这三个过程应用于数据。结论:五点标度的k最近邻分析比二进制数据更好,表明中间值有助于分类。 k均值聚类的性能比KNN稍好,并且对模糊数据的效果最好。使用FCM可获得最佳的总体结果。 FCM使用1.25指数进行分类最好。研究的意义和影响:三种模式识别方法相对于其他生物分类方法具有一些优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号