首页> 外文期刊>Journal of applied microbiology >Investigation of antibiotic and antibacterial agent cross-resistance in target bacteria from homes of antibacterial product users and nonusers
【24h】

Investigation of antibiotic and antibacterial agent cross-resistance in target bacteria from homes of antibacterial product users and nonusers

机译:抗菌产品使用者和非使用者家中目标细菌中抗生素和抗菌剂交叉耐药性的调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Aim: To describe the relationship between antibiotic and antibacterial resistance in environmental and clinical bacteria from home environments across geographical locations, relative to the use or nonuse of antibacterial products, with a focus on target organisms recognized as potential human pathogens. Methods and Results: In a randomized study, environmental and clinical samples were collected from the homes of antibacterial product users (n=30) and nonusers (n=30) for the isolation of target bacteria for antibiotic and antibacterial testing in three geographical areas (in USA and UK). Isolates were tested for antibiotic susceptibility, with selected antibiotic-resistant and antibiotic-susceptible isolates tested against four common antibacterial agents (triclosan, para-chloro-meta-xylenol, pine oil and quaternary ammonium compound). Prequalified users and nonusers at each location were randomly selected after meeting exclusionary criteria. Of 1238 isolates, more target bacteria were recovered from nonuser than user homes. Of Staphylococcus aureus isolates (n=33), none showed resistance to oxacillin or vancomycin; for Enterococcus sp. (n=149), none were resistant to ampicillin or vancomycin; and for Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=54) and Escherichia coli (n=24), none were resistant to third generation cephalosporins. Antibiotic resistance to one or more of the standard test panel drugs for Gram-positive and Gram-negative target bacteria was comparable between nonuser and user homes for both environmental and clinical isolates [e.g. resistance of environmental coagulase-negative (CN) Staphylococcus sp. was 73.8% (124/168) from nonuser homes compared with 78.0% from user homes]. Of 524 Gram-negatives tested against preferred/alternative drugs, 97.1% (509/524) were susceptible to all antibiotics, across both groups. Isolates of S. aureus, Enterococcus sp. and CN Staphylococcus sp. susceptible to all preferred treatment drugs showed comparable antibacterial minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) results between nonuser and user home isolates. For Gram-positives resistant to one or more preferred drugs, greatest resistance to antibacterial active ingredients was found in the nonuser group. For Gram-negatives, the antibacterial MIC data were comparable for isolates that were fully susceptible and resistant to one or more preferred/alternative treatment antibiotics. Conclusions: The results showed a lack of antibiotic and antibacterial agent cross-resistance in target bacteria from the homes of antibacterial product users and nonusers, as well as increased prevalence of potential pathogens in nonuser homes. Significance and Impact of the Study: It refutes widely publicized, yet unsupported, hypotheses that use of antibacterial products facilitates the development of antibiotic resistance in bacteria from the home environment.
机译:目的:描述相对于使用或不使用抗菌产品而言,来自不同地理位置的家庭环境中的环境细菌和临床细菌中抗生素和抗菌素耐药性之间的关系,重点关注被认为是潜在人类病原体的目标生物。方法和结果:在一项随机研究中,从抗菌产品使用者(n = 30)和非使用者(n = 30)的住所中收集了环境和临床样本,以分离目标细菌以进行三个地理区域的抗生素和抗菌测试(在美国和英国)。测试了分离物的抗生素敏感性,并针对四种常见抗菌剂(三氯生,对氯-间二甲苯酚,松油和季铵化合物)测试了选定的抗生素抗性和抗生素敏感性分离物。在符合排除标准后,将随机选择每个地点的资格预审用户和非用户。在1238株分离物中,从非使用者中回收的靶细菌多于使用者家。在金黄色葡萄球菌分离株(n = 33)中,没有一个显示出对奥沙西林或万古霉素的抗性;用于肠球菌(n = 149),没有人对氨苄西林或万古霉素有抗药性;对于肺炎克雷伯菌(n = 54)和大肠杆菌(n = 24),没有一株对第三代头孢菌素有抗药性。非使用者和使用者家庭对环境和临床分离株对革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性目标细菌对一种或多种标准测试药物的抗生素抗性相当。环境凝固酶阴性(CN)葡萄球菌的耐药性非使用者房屋的使用率为73.8%(124/168),而使用者房屋的使用率为78.0%]。在524例针对首选/替代药物的革兰氏阴性菌中,两组中97.1%(509/524)的患者对所有抗生素均敏感。金黄色葡萄球菌肠球菌sp。的分离株。和CN葡萄球菌sp。对所有首选治疗药物敏感的人在非使用者和使用者家中分离株之间显示出相当的抗菌最小抑菌浓度(MIC)结果。对于抗一种或多种优选药物的革兰氏阳性菌,非使用者组对抗菌活性成分的抵抗力最大。对于革兰氏阴性菌,对于完全敏感并对一种或多种优选/替代治疗抗生素具有抗性的菌株,其抗菌MIC数据相当。结论:结果表明,来自抗菌产品使用者和非使用者家庭的目标细菌缺乏对抗生素和抗菌剂的交叉耐药性,并且非使用者家庭中潜在病原体的流行增加。该研究的意义和影响:它驳斥了广泛宣传但尚未得到支持的假设,即使用抗菌产品促进家庭环境中细菌产生抗生素抗性的假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号