首页> 外文期刊>Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine: CCLM >Radioimmunoassay of free plasma metanephrines for the diagnosis of catecholamine-producing tumors
【24h】

Radioimmunoassay of free plasma metanephrines for the diagnosis of catecholamine-producing tumors

机译:游离血浆间肾上腺素的放射免疫测定可诊断产生儿茶酚胺的肿瘤

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The determination of plasma metanephrines (MNs) provides a highly sensitive test for the diagnosis of catecholamine producing tumors. Chromatographic determinations with electrochemical or mass spectrometric detections are the methods of choice, but immunological assays have been developed. This study evaluated the clinical performances of a radioimmunoassay for free MNs in plasma. Methods: MNs, normetanephrine (NMN) and metanephrine (MN) and catecholamines, norepinephrine (NE) and epinephrine (E) were determined in plasma and urine of 533 patients suspected of catecholamine producing tumor. Urinary and plasma catecholamines and urinary MNs were determined by HPLC using amperometric detection. Plasma MNs were purified by solid phase chromatography and quantified by a specific radioimmunoassay. Results: Fifty-nine patients had tumors (13 paraganglioma and 46 pheochromocytoma) and the diagnosis was excluded in 474 patients. Receiver operator characteristic curves have identified optimal thresholds at 100 pg/mL for plasma NMN (sensitivity 96.6% and specificity 95.8%) and 70 pg/mL for plasma MN (sensitivity 61.0% and specificity 96.8%). These cut-off values were lower than those suggested by the manufacturer (170 and 100 pg/mL, respectively). The sensitivity of combined MNs was similar in plasma (100%) and urine (98%) but higher than that of urinary catecholamines (85%, p < 0.001). The specificity of combined MNs in plasma (95%) was higher than urinary MNs (85%, p < 0.001) and plasma catecholamines (75%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Plasma-free and urinary-total MNs have a better discriminative power than catecholamines in the diagnosis of catecholamines producing tumors. Using these established cut-offs, measurement of plasma-free MN by radioimmunoassay represents an effective alternative to chromatographic methods.
机译:背景:血浆中肾上腺素(MNs)的测定为诊断儿茶酚胺产生的肿瘤提供了高度灵敏的测试。通过电化学或质谱检测进行色谱测定是选择的方法,但是已经开发了免疫测定。这项研究评估了血浆中游离MN的放射免疫分析的临床性能。方法:对533例怀疑儿茶酚胺产生肿瘤的患者的血浆和尿液中的MN,去甲肾上腺素(NMN),间肾上腺素(MN)和儿茶酚胺,去甲肾上腺素(NE)和肾上腺素(E)进行了测定。尿液和血浆儿茶酚胺以及尿中的MNs采用安培检测法通过HPLC测定。通过固相色谱法纯化血浆MN,并通过特异性放射免疫分析法定量。结果:59例肿瘤(13例神经节旁瘤和46例嗜铬细胞瘤),并排除了474例患者的诊断。接收者操作员特征曲线已确定血浆NMN(灵敏度96.6%和特异性95.8%)和血浆MN(灵敏度61.0%和特异性96.8%)分别为100 pg / mL和70 pg / mL的最佳阈值。这些临界值低于制造商建议的临界值(分别为170和100 pg / mL)。血浆(100%)和尿液(98%)中合并的MNs的敏感性相似,但高于尿儿茶酚胺(85%,p <0.001)。合并的MN在血浆中的特异性(95%)高于尿MN(85%,p <0.001)和血浆儿茶酚胺(75%,p <0.001)。结论:在诊断产生儿茶酚胺的肿瘤中,无血浆和尿总MNs比儿茶酚胺具有更好的判别力。使用这些确定的临界值,通过放射免疫测定法测量无血浆MN代表了色谱方法的有效替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号