首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology >Quantifying Differences between 2-m Temperature Observations and Reanalysis Pressure-Level Temperatures in Northwestern North America
【24h】

Quantifying Differences between 2-m Temperature Observations and Reanalysis Pressure-Level Temperatures in Northwestern North America

机译:量化北美西北地区2 m温度观测值与再分析压力水平温度之间的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In northwestern North America, which is a large area with complex physiography, Climatic Research Unit (CRU) Time Series, version 2.1, (TS 2.1) gridded monthly mean 2-m temperatures are systematically iower than interpolated monthly averaged North American Regional Reanalysis (NARR) pressure-level temperatures—in particular, in the winter. Quantification of these differences based on CRU gridded observations can be used to estimate pressure-level temperatures from CRU 2-m temperatures (1901-2002) that predate the NARR period (since 1979). Such twentieth-century pressure-level temperature fields can be used in glacier mass-balance modeling and as an alternative to calibrating general circulation model control runs, avoiding the need for accurate boundary layer parameterization. In this paper, an approach is presented that is transferable to moisture, wind, and other 3D fields with potential applications in wind power generation, ecology, and air quality. At each CRU grid point, the difference between CRU and NARR is regressed against seven predictors in CRU (mean temperature, daily temperature range, precipitation, vapor pressure, cloud cover, and number of wet and frost days) for the period of overlap between CRU and NARR (1979-2002). Bayesian model averaging (BMA) is used to avoid overfitting the CRU-NARR differences and underestimating uncertainties. In cross validations, BMA provides reliable posterior predictions of the CRU-NARR differences and outperforms predictions from three alternativemodels: the constant model (24-yr mean), the regression model of highest Bayesian model probability, and the full model retaining all seven predictors in CRU.
机译:在面积很大,地理复杂的北美西北地区,气候研究单位(CRU)时间序列2.1版(TS 2.1)的网格平均月平均2米温度比插值的北美地区平均再分析(NARR)系统地低)压力水平的温度-尤其是在冬天。基于CRU网格观测值对这些差异进行的量化可用于从NARR时期(自1979年)开始的CRU 2-m温度(1901-2002)估算压力水平温度。这样的20世纪压力水平温度场可用于冰川质量平衡建模,并可作为校准一般循环模型控制运行的替代方法,从而避免了对精确边界层参数化的需求。在本文中,提出了一种可转移到湿度,风和其他3D领域的方法,在风力发电,生态和空气质量方面具有潜在的应用。在CRU的每个网格点,CRU和NARR之间的差异针对CRU之间的重叠期间的七个预测因子(平均温度,每日温度范围,降水,蒸气压,云量以及湿润和霜冻天数)进行回归。和NARR(1979-2002)。贝叶斯模型平均(BMA)用于避免过拟合CRU-NARR差异和低估不确定性。在交叉验证中,BMA提供了对CRU-NARR差异的可靠后验预测,并且优于以下三种备选模型的预测:常数模型(均值24年),最高贝叶斯模型概率回归模型以及保留所有七个预测变量的完整模型CRU。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号