...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical therapeutics >Efficacy and safety of delapril plus manidipine compared with enalapril plus hydrochlorothiazide in mild to moderate essential hypertension: results of a randomized trial.
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of delapril plus manidipine compared with enalapril plus hydrochlorothiazide in mild to moderate essential hypertension: results of a randomized trial.

机译:地拉普利加马尼地平与依那普利加氢氯噻嗪相比在轻度至中度原发性高血压中的疗效和安全性:一项随机试验的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: The use of combination therapy is required to achieve blood pressure targets in 40% to 75% of patients with hypertension. There have been few studies comparing the efficacy and tolerability of the new fixed combination of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor delapril 30 mg and the calcium channel antagonist manidipine 10 mg with those of a standard combination of another ACE inhibitor and a diuretic. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of delapril 30 mg given alone or with manidipine 10 mg with those of enalapril 20 mg given alone or with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. METHODS: This was a multicenter, active-controlled, parallel-group trial. After an initial 2-week placebo run-in period, patients aged 18 to 75 years with diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > or =90 and < or =109 mm Hg were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive delapril or enalapril for 8 weeks. After the initial 8 weeks, nonresponders (DBP > or =85 mm Hg) received an additional 8 weeks of treatment with a fixed combination of delapril + manidipine or enalapril + HCTZ; patients whose DBP was normalized continued their initial monotherapy through the end of the study. The primary efficacy variable was the change in sitting DBP at the end of treatment. Secondary efficacy variables were the percentage of patients whose DBP was normalized (DBP Z:85 mm Hg) and the percentage of responders (> or =10-mm Hg reduction in DBP or DBP <85 mm Hg). RESULTS: One hundred sixty patients (84 men, 76 women) were randomized to receive delapril (n = 106) or enalapril (n = 54). After 16 weeks of treatment, the mean (SD) reduction in DBP was similar with the 2 treatments (delapril, -14 [8] mm Hg; enalapril, -15 [8] mm Hg). In the delapril and enalapril groups, DBP was normalized in a respective 55 (51.9%) and 29 (53.7%) patients, and 77 (72.6%) and 38 (70.4%) were responders; there was no significant difference between groups. Tolerability was also similar in both groups--10 (9.4%) patients in the delapril group and 5 (9.3%) in the enalapril group experienced adverse events that were judged related to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that delapril alone or combined with manidipine is well tolerated and as effective as enalapril alone or combined with HCTZ in lowering blood pressure in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.
机译:背景:需要使用组合疗法以使40%至75%的高血压患者达到血压目标。鲜有研究比较血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂地拉普利和钙通道拮抗剂马尼地平10 mg的新固定组合与另一种ACE抑制剂和利尿剂的标准组合的疗效和耐受性。目的:本研究的目的是比较轻度至中度原发性高血压患者单独或与马尼地平10 mg一起服用地拉普利30 mg与单独或与氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)一起服用enalapril 20 mg的抗高血压药的疗效和耐受性。方法:这是一项多中心,主动控制,平行组试验。在最初的2周安慰剂磨合期之后,将舒张压(DBP)>或= 90和<或= 109 mm Hg的18至75岁年龄段的患者以2:1的比例随机分配,以接受地拉普利或依那普利治疗8个星期。在最初的8周后,无反应者(DBP>或= 85 mm Hg)接受了固定的Delapril + manidipine或enalapril + HCTZ固定治疗另外8周; DBP正常化的患者在研究结束之前继续其最初的单药治疗。主要功效变量是治疗结束时坐姿DBP的变化。次要疗效变量是DBP正常化的患者百分比(DBP Z:85 mm Hg)和反应者百分比(DBP降低或≥10mm Hg或DBP <85 mm Hg)。结果:一百六十名患者(84名男性,76名女性)被随机分配接受地拉普利(n = 106)或依那普利(nenalapril)(n = 54)。治疗16周后,DBP的平均降低(SD)与2种治疗相似(地拉普利-14 [8] mm Hg;依那普利-15 [8] mm Hg)。在地拉普利和依那普利组中,分别有55名(51.9%)和29名(53.7%)患者的DBP正常化,有77名(72.6%)和38名(70.4%)的患者有反应;两组之间无显着差异。两组的耐受性也相似-地拉普利组的-10(9.4%)患者和依那普利组的5(9.3%)患者经历了与治疗有关的不良事件。结论:这项研究的结果表明,在轻度至中度原发性高血压患者中,单独使用地拉普利或与马尼地平联合使用地拉普利具有良好的耐受性,与单独使用依那普利或与HCTZ联合使用具有良好的耐受性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号