首页> 外文期刊>Clinical therapeutics >Open-label, randomized comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of clarithromycin, levofloxacin, and cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of adults with acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.
【24h】

Open-label, randomized comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of clarithromycin, levofloxacin, and cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of adults with acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.

机译:开放性,随机比较克拉霉素,左氧氟沙星和头孢呋辛酯治疗成人支气管炎急性加重的疗效和耐受性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: In the absence of a confirmed pathogen, empiric antimicrobial treatment of patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (ABECB) is accepted as standard practice and recommended in treatment guidelines. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of a 10-day course of 3 antimicrobial regimens commonly used to treat adults with ABECB. METHODS: This prospective, open-label, randomized study assessed clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily, levofloxacin 500 mg once daily, and cefuroxime axetil 250 mg twice daily, each administered for 10 days with food, in patients with ABECB. Efficacy was determined on the basis of the clinical response to treatment and need for hospitalization and/or further antimicrobial therapy. RESULTS: A total of 283 patients (150 men, 133 women) with a mean age of 55 years (range, 29 to 86 years) were randomized to receive clarithromycin (n = 97), levofloxacin (n = 94), or cefuroxime axetil (n = 92). Of 262 clinically assessable patients, clinical cure or improvement occurred in 87.9% (80/91) of those treated with clarithromycin, 87.4% (76/87) of those treated with levofloxacin, and 79.8% (67/84) of those treated with cefuroxime axetil. Eight (8.8%) clarithromycin-treated patients, 6 (6.9%) levofloxacin-treated patients, and 12 (14.3%) cefuroxime axetil-treated patients required a change in antimicrobial therapy to achieve clinical cure/improvement; between-group differences were not significant. No patients treated with clarithromycin required hospitalization for further antimicrobial treatment, compared with 3.4% (3/87) of levofloxacin-treated and 3.6% (3/84) of cefuroxime axetil-treated patients (P = NS). A total of 6.2% (6/97) of clarithromycin-treated patients were prematurely discontinued from treatment due to adverse events, compared with 7.4% (7/94) and 8.7% (8/92) of levofloxacin- and cefuroxime axetil-treated patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: A high rate of clinical efficacy and tolerability was observed in this population of patients with ABECB treated with clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily, levofloxacin 500 mg once daily, or cefuroxime axetil 250 mg twice daily for 10 days.
机译:背景:在没有确定的病原体的情况下,对慢性支气管炎急性加重和慢性支气管炎急性细菌加重(ABECB)的患者进行经验性抗菌治疗已被接受为标准做法,并在治疗指南中建议使用。目的:本研究比较了通常用于治疗成人ABECB的3种抗菌方案的10天疗程的疗效和耐受性。方法:这项前瞻性,开放标签,随机研究评估了ABECB患者的克拉霉素每天两次500毫克,左氧氟沙星每天500毫克和头孢呋辛酯250毫克每天两次,分别与食物一起服用10天。根据对治疗的临床反应以及住院和/或进一步的抗菌治疗的需要来确定疗效。结果:平均年龄为55岁(范围29至86岁)的283例患者(150例男性,133例女性)被随机分配接受克拉霉素(n = 97),左氧氟沙星(n = 94)或头孢呋辛酯(n = 92)。在262例临床可评估患者中,使用克拉霉素治疗的患者中,有87.9%(80/91)发生了临床治愈或改善,使用左氧氟沙星治疗的患者中有87.4%(76/87),以及使用左氧氟沙星治疗的患者中有79.8%(67/84)头孢呋辛酯。 8例(8.8%)克拉霉素治疗患者,6例(6.9%)左氧氟沙星治疗患者和12例(14.3%)头孢呋辛酯治疗的患者需要改变抗生素治疗以实现临床治愈/改善;组间差异不显着。与使用左氧氟沙星治疗的患者的3.4%(3/87)和使用头孢呋辛酯治疗的患者的3.6%(3/84)的患者相比,没有使用克拉霉素治疗的患者需要住院以接受进一步的抗菌治疗(P = NS)。总计6.2%(6/97)的克拉霉素治疗患者因不良事件而提前中止治疗,而左氧氟沙星和头孢呋辛酯治疗的患者分别为7.4%(7/94)和8.7%(8/92)病人。结论:在ABECB患者中,每天两次克拉霉素500 mg,左氧氟沙星500 mg每天一次或头孢呋辛酯250 mg每天两次,治疗10天,ABECB患者的临床疗效和耐受性较高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号