首页> 外文期刊>Clinical therapeutics >Comparison of the efficacy of extended-release clarithromycin tablets and amoxicillin/clavulanate tablets in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.
【24h】

Comparison of the efficacy of extended-release clarithromycin tablets and amoxicillin/clavulanate tablets in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.

机译:克拉霉素缓释片和阿莫西林/克拉维酸盐片在治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重中的疗效比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Clarithromycin has established efficacy and safety in the treatment of respiratory infections. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the efficacy and safety of a new extended-release formulation of clarithromycin compared with amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB). METHODS: This phase IIIB, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, investigator-blinded study in patients with AECB and productive cough with purulent sputum compared treatment with extended-release clarithromycin (two 500-mg tablets once daily for 7 days) and amoxicillin/clavulanate (one 875-mg tablet twice daily for 10 days). Assessments were performed before treatment, between study days 10 and 12 (or within 48 hours after premature discontinuation), and between study days 17 and 21 (test of cure). RESULTS: Of 287 patients randomized and treated, 270 were clinically evaluable (137 clarithromycin, 133 amoxicillin/clavulanate). Treatment groups were well matched in terms of demographic characteristics, medical condition, and history. Among clinically evaluable patients at test of cure, 85% and 87% of clarithromycin- and amoxicillin/clavulanate-treated patients, respectively, demonstrated clinical cure (as defined in 1998 draft US Food and Drug Administration guidelines); among clinically and bacteriologically evaluable patients, 92% versus 89%, respectively, demonstrated bacteriologic cure. Overall pathogen eradication rates were similar in the 2 groups (88% clarithromycin, 89% amoxicillin/clavulanate). Rates of premature discontinuation of study drug for any reason differed between treatments: 3% (4/142) of clarithromycin-treated patients versus 12% (17/145) of amoxicillin/clavulanate-treated patients (P = 0.005). One percent (2/142) and 6% (8/145) of the respective treatment groups discontinued study drug because of adverse events. Adverse events generally occurred with a similar frequency in the 2 groups; however, taste alteration was more common with clarithromycin (9/142 [6%]) than with amoxicillin/clavulanate (1/145 [1%]; P = 0.01). Mean severity scores for gastrointestinal adverse events showed a significant difference between groups (1.16 for clarithromycin-treated patients and 1.58 for amoxicillin/clavulanate-treated patients: P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate the clinical and bacteriologic equivalence and improved gastrointestinal tolerability of a 7-day course of once-daily extended-release clarithromycin relative to a 10-day course of twice-daily amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of AECB.
机译:背景:克拉霉素已在呼吸道感染的治疗中建立了疗效和安全性。目的:本研究检查了克拉霉素新缓释制剂与阿莫西林/克拉维酸盐相比在治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重中的有效性和安全性。方法:该IIIB期,多中心,随机,平行分组,研究者盲的研究针对患有AECB和脓性痰的生产性咳嗽的患者进行了比较,采用缓释克拉霉素(每天两次,每次500 mg,共7天)和阿莫西林/克拉维酸盐(一粒875毫克的片剂,每天两次,持续10天)。在治疗前,研究第10至12天之间(或过早停用后48小时内)以及研究17至21天(治愈测试)之间进行评估。结果:在随机分配和治疗的287例患者中,有270例在临床上可评估(克拉霉素137例,阿莫西林/克拉维酸133例)。治疗组在人口统计学特征,医疗状况和病史方面非常匹配。在经过临床评估的治愈测试患者中,克拉霉素和阿莫西林/克拉维酸盐治疗的患者分别有85%和87%表现出临床治愈(如1998年美国食品和药物管理局指南草案所定义);在临床和细菌学评估的患者中,分别有92%和89%的患者表现出细菌学治愈。两组的总体病原体清除率相似(克拉霉素88%,阿莫西林/克拉维酸89%)。治疗之间由于任何原因而提前终止研究药物的比率在治疗之间有所不同:克拉霉素治疗的患者为3%(4/142),阿莫西林/克拉维酸盐治疗的患者为12%(17/145)(P = 0.005)。各自治疗组中有1%(2/142)和6%(8/145)因不良事件而中止了研究药物。两组中不良事件的发生频率通常相似。但是,克拉霉素(9/142 [6%])比阿莫西林/克拉维酸盐(1/145 [1%]; P = 0.01)更容易引起口味改变。胃肠道不良事件的平均严重程度评分显示两组之间存在显着差异(克拉霉素治疗患者为1.16,阿莫西林/克拉维酸盐治疗患者为1.58:P = 0.016)。结论:这项研究的结果表明,相对于每天两次阿莫西林/克拉维酸每天两次的阿莫西林/克拉维酸的10天疗程,每天一次的缓释克拉霉素的7天疗程的临床和细菌学等效性以及改善的胃肠道耐受性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号