首页> 外文期刊>Journal of drugs in dermatology: JDD >Efficacy and tolerability of adapalene 0.3% gel compared to tazarotene 0.1% gel in the treatment of acne vulgaris.
【24h】

Efficacy and tolerability of adapalene 0.3% gel compared to tazarotene 0.1% gel in the treatment of acne vulgaris.

机译:阿达帕林0.3%凝胶与他扎罗汀0.1%凝胶治疗寻常痤疮的功效和耐受性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Treatment of acne vulgaris can be challenging for both patients and physicians. Topical retinoids are often considered first-line therapy for the treatment of all but the most severe forms of acne. A variety of formulations of topical retinoids, including adapalene and tazarotene, are available but tazarotene 0.1% gel is widely perceived to be the most efficacious. The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a new, higher concentration of adapalene, adapalene 0.3% gel, compared to tazarotene 0.1% gel in the treatment of acne vulgaris. The primary efficacy outcome was the percent reduction in total lesion count at week 12. Subjects 12 to 35 years of age with acne vulgaris (N=172) participated in a 12-week, randomized, evaluator-blinded, noninferiority study of once-daily therapy with adapalene 0.3% gel or tazarotene 0.1% gel. Subjects in each group achieved clinically significant reductions in total lesion counts at week 12 (61% and 57% median reductions for adapalene and tazarotene, respectively); adapalene 0.3% gel was noninferior to tazarotene 0.1% gel (95% confidence interval [CI]: -5.2-9.6). The adapalene arm was also therapeutically similar to the tazarotene arm in terms of the percent reduction in inflammatory and noninflammatory lesion counts at week 12, as well as in the assessments of acne severity and improvement. Mean tolerability scores for erythema, dryness, scaling, and stinging/burning were consistently lower in the adapalene arm compared to patients treated with tazarotene (P<.014 at week 12, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel [CMH] test). The worst score for any tolerability parameter in the treatment phase in the adapalene arm was less than 1 (mild). Adapalene was also associated with a lower incidence of treatment-related adverse events when compared to tazarotene (3.5% versus 14%, respectively). Once daily therapy with adapalene 0.3% gel provided similar efficacy (noninferior) to tazarotene 0.1% gel in the treatment of acne vulgaris, but demonstrated a superior tolerability profile.
机译:寻常痤疮的治疗对患者和医生而言都是具有挑战性的。局部类维生素A通常被认为是治疗除最严重形式的痤疮以外的所有痤疮的一线疗法。可以使用多种局部类视黄醇制剂,包括阿达帕林和他扎罗汀,但普遍认为他扎罗汀0.1%凝胶是最有效的。这项研究的目的是评估一种新的,更高浓度的阿达帕林,0.3%的阿达帕林凝胶(相比于他扎罗汀0.1%的凝胶)治疗寻常性痤疮的疗效和耐受性。主要疗效结果是在第12周时总病变计数减少的百分比。12至35岁的寻常痤疮(N = 172)患者参加了为期12周,随机,评估者盲目,每日一次的非劣效性研究。阿达帕林0.3%凝胶或他扎罗汀0.1%凝胶治疗。每组的受试者在第12周的总病灶数均有临床显着降低(阿达帕林和他扎罗汀的中位数降低分别为61%和57%); 0.3%阿达帕林凝胶不逊于他扎罗汀0.1%凝胶(95%置信区间[CI]:-5.2-9.6)。就第12周炎性和非炎性病变计数减少的百分比以及痤疮严重程度和改善的评估而言,阿达帕林组在治疗上也与他扎罗汀组相似。与他扎罗汀治疗的患者相比,阿达帕林组的红斑,干燥,脱屑和刺痛/灼伤的平均耐受性评分始终较低(第12周,P <.014,Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel [CMH]测试)。阿达帕林组治疗阶段任何耐受性参数的最差得分均小于1(轻度)。与他扎罗汀相比,阿达帕林还与治疗相关的不良事件发生率更低(分别为3.5%和14%)。每天使用0.3%阿达帕林凝胶治疗在寻常性痤疮中提供的功效与非他扎罗汀0.1%凝胶相似(同等),但显示出优异的耐受性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号