首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology >The Tolerability Profile of Clindamycin 1/Benzoyl Peroxide 5 Gel vs. Adapalene 0.1/Benzoyl Peroxide 2.5 Gel for Facial Acne
【2h】

The Tolerability Profile of Clindamycin 1/Benzoyl Peroxide 5 Gel vs. Adapalene 0.1/Benzoyl Peroxide 2.5 Gel for Facial Acne

机译:克林霉素1%/过氧化苯甲酰5%凝胶相对于阿达帕林0.1%/过氧化苯甲酰2.5%凝胶对面部痤疮的耐受性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective: To compare the first two weeks of tolerability of clindamycin/benzoyl peroxide gel versus adapalene/benzoyl peroxide gel followed by six weeks of open-label clindamycin/benzoyl peroxide gel therapy in subjects with mild-to-moderate acne who participated in two eight-week, identically designed, clinical studies. >Methods: Using a split-face method, patients received both clindamycin/benzoyl peroxide gel and adapalene/benzoyl peroxide gel once daily for two weeks (allocation to the right or left side of the face was randomized) in an investigator-blinded fashion. Patients then went on to receive a further six weeks of open-label, full-face clindamycin/benzoyl peroxide gel. The primary outcome was to compare signs and symptoms of tolerability during the first two weeks of treatment using an investigator-assessed 4-point rating scale. Secondary endpoints included assessment of acne severity (Investigator Static Global Assessment and lesion counts), quality of life, product acceptability/preference, and patient assessments of tolerability and safety. >Results: Of the 76 subjects enrolled in the two studies, 72 completed them. Overall both products were well tolerated, but mean scores for erythema, dryness, and peeling were significantly higher with adapalene/benzoyl peroxide gel than with clindamycin/benzoyl peroxide gel at both Weeks 1 and 2 (p<0.03). Patients also rated clindamycin/benzoyl peroxide gel significantly more tolerable than adapalene/benzoyl peroxide gel for redness, dryness, burning, itching, and scaling at Weeks 1 and 2 (p 0.0073). Mean Investigator Static Global Assessment score improved with both products during the first two weeks of treatment and continued to show significant improvement versus baseline when treatment with clindamycin/benzoyl peroxide gel was continued for a further six weeks (p<0.001 at Week 8). Lesion counts improved throughout the study with significant reductions from baseline occurring at Weeks 5 and 8 (p<0.0001 for both time points for total lesion counts). Clindamycin/benzoyl peroxide gel and adapalene/benzoyl peroxide gel were well tolerated, with most adverse events of mild-to-moderate severity. >Conclusion: Clindamycin/benzoyl peroxide gel had better tolerability with regard to erythema, dryness, and peeling than adapalene/benzoyl peroxide gel during the first two weeks of treatment.
机译:>目的:比较轻度至轻度受试者的克林霉素/过氧化苯甲酰凝胶与阿达帕林/过氧化苯甲酰凝胶的耐受性的前两周,然后比较开放标签的克林霉素/过氧化苯甲酰凝胶治疗的六周耐受性中度痤疮,他们参加了两个为期八周,设计相同的临床研究。 >方法:使用劈开法,患者每天两次接受克林霉素/过氧化苯甲酰凝胶和阿达帕林/过氧化苯甲酰凝胶两次,连续两周(随机分配在面部的左侧或右侧)。研究者盲目的时尚。然后,患者继续接受六周开放标签的全脸克林霉素/过氧化苯甲酰凝胶治疗。主要结局是使用研究者评估的4分评分量表比较治疗前两周的耐受性体征和症状。次要终点包括痤疮严重程度评估(研究人员静态总体评估和病变计数),生活质量,产品可接受性/偏好以及患者对耐受性和安全性的评估。 >结果:在两项研究的76名受试者中,有72名完成了研究。总体上,两种产品的耐受性都很好,但是在第1周和第2周,使用阿达帕林/过氧化苯甲酰凝胶的红斑,干燥和剥离的平均评分明显高于使用克林霉素/过氧化苯甲酰的凝胶(p <0.03)。在第1周和第2周,患者对克林霉素/过氧化苯甲酰凝胶的泛红,干燥,灼热,瘙痒和结垢的耐受性也明显优于阿达帕林/过氧化苯甲酰凝胶(p 0.0073)。在治疗的前两周,两种产品的平均研究者静态总体评估得分均得到改善,并且当继续用克林霉素/过氧化苯甲酰凝胶治疗六周时,与基线相比,其基线表现出显着改善(p <0.001在第8周)。在整个研究中,病变计数均得到了改善,与第5周和第8周的基线相比有了显着降低(总病变计数的两个时间点均p <0.0001)。克林霉素/过氧化苯甲酰凝胶和阿达帕林/过氧化苯甲酰凝胶具有良好的耐受性,最轻度至中度的严重不良事件。 >结论:在治疗的前两周,克林霉素/过氧化苯甲酰凝胶对红斑,干燥和剥离的耐受性优于阿达帕林/过氧化苯甲酰凝胶。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号