首页> 外文期刊>Journal of drugs in dermatology: JDD >Comparison of skin concentrations following topical versus oral corticosteroid treatment: reconsidering the treatment of common inflammatory dermatoses.
【24h】

Comparison of skin concentrations following topical versus oral corticosteroid treatment: reconsidering the treatment of common inflammatory dermatoses.

机译:局部和口服皮质类固醇激素治疗后皮肤浓度的比较:重新考虑常见炎症性皮肤病的治疗。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Topical corticosteroids are often considered to have greater safety and poorer efficacy than oral corticosteroids in treating psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. There are limited data for assessing relative efficacy of topical and systemic corticosteroids, however. The concentration of corticosteroid in skin, adjusted for the relative potency of the active compound, may be a predictor of clinical efficacy and can be estimated for both topical and oral administration. PURPOSE: To analyze the assumption that oral corticosteroid therapy should be more potent than topical therapy by comparing relative corticosteroid concentrations in the skin expected with topical versus systemic administration. METHODS: The estimated skin concentration of prednisone following oral dosing was calculated based on data showing 70-100% bioavailability and an even tissue distribution. Data on the concentration of corticosteroids found in skin after topical application were obtained from the literature. The relative potencies of corticosteroid molecules were then used to compare skin concentrations of corticosteroid following topical versus oral treatment. RESULTS: Data derived from the existing literature demonstrated that hydrocortisone 2.5% ointment, triamcinolone 0.1% ointment, and clobetasol 0.05% foam achieved effective skin concentrations greater than the effective concentration achieved by oral prednisone. Betamethasone 0.1% cream achieved effective concentrations in skin within the range created by oral prednisone. LIMITATIONS: This analysis was limited by the paucity of data regarding cutaneous concentrations of corticosteroids after topical application, and by the differing experimental designs utilized in the available studies. CONCLUSION: Most topical corticosteroids have the potential to achieve greater effective drug levels in the superficial layers of skin than those achieved with standard doses of oral prednisone. The apparently greater efficacy of oral corticosteroid therapy may be attributable, in part, to poor patient compliance with topical therapy. Systemic alterations in immune function following oral, but not topical, corticosteroid use may also play a role.
机译:背景:在治疗牛皮癣和特应性皮炎方面,外用皮质类固醇通常被认为比口服皮质类固醇具有更高的安全性和更差的疗效。但是,用于评估局部和全身性皮质类固醇相对疗效的数据有限。根据活性化合物的相对效力进行调整后,皮质类固醇的浓度可能是临床疗效的预测指标,可以通过局部和口服给药进行估算。目的:通过比较局部和全身给药预期的皮肤相对皮质类固醇浓度来分析口服皮质类固醇治疗应比局部治疗更有效的假设。方法:基于显示70-100%的生物利用度和均匀的组织分布的数据,计算了口服泼尼松的估计皮肤浓度。从文献中获得局部应用后皮肤中发现的皮质类固醇浓度的数据。然后使用皮质类固醇分子的相对效能比较局部和口服治疗后皮质类固醇的皮肤浓度。结果:从现有文献中得出的数据表明,氢化可的松2.5%软膏,曲安西龙0.1%软膏和氯倍他索0.05%泡沫可获得的皮肤有效浓度大于口服泼尼松的有效浓度。 0.1%倍他米松乳膏在口服泼尼松产生的皮肤范围内达到有效浓度。局限性:该分析受限于局部应用后有关皮质类固醇皮肤浓度的数据缺乏,以及现有研究中使用的不同实验设计。结论:大多数局部皮质类固醇激素在皮肤表层具有比标准口服强的松剂量更高的有效药物水平。口服皮质类固醇疗法明显更高的疗效可能部分归因于患者对局部疗法的依从性较差。口服但非局部使用皮质类固醇激素后,免疫功能发生全身性改变也可能起作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号