...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine: CCLM >Validation of commercial assays for measurements of trefoil factor family peptides in serum
【24h】

Validation of commercial assays for measurements of trefoil factor family peptides in serum

机译:用于测定血清中三叶因子家族肽的商业化验方法的验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Trefoil peptides (TFF1, TFF2 and TFF3) are 7-12 kDa molecules, secreted by mucin-producing epithelial cells. Increased serum concentrations have been reported in a number of pathological conditions, which warrants the need for validated commercially available assays. Methods: We validated commercial assays for TFF1-3 and compared results obtained with our in-house assays, using serum from blood donors.Results: Level of detection was: <0.008 nmol/L. Measuring ranges were: 0.032-0.51 (TFF1), 0.038-0.76 (TFF2) and 0.019-0.15 (TFF3) nmol/L. Imprecision (CV), judged from the measurement of serum pools in two levels, was below 9% (TFF2 and TFF3) but up to 18% (mean 0.41 nmol/L) for TFF1. No cross reactivity between the TFFs (concentrations > 100 nmol/L) was observed. The 95% non-parametric reference intervals were: <0.0032-0.53 (TFF1), 0.099-1.4 (TFF2) and 0.086-0.87 (TFF3) nmol/L. Comparing commercial to in-house assays (n=132), showed biases explained by differences in the calibrators (TFF1 and TFF2). A number of samples showed markedly different results. Conclusions: The commercial assays for TFF2 and TFF3 are acceptable for use on serum samples, while the TFF1 assay revealed a poor imprecision and a too narrow measuring range. Results obtained with the commercial and the in-house assays differed, partly because of differences in the calibrators employed.
机译:背景:三叶肽(TFF1,TFF2和TFF3)是7-12 kDa分子,由产生粘蛋白的上皮细胞分泌。据报道,在许多病理条件下血清浓度升高,因此需要经过验证的可商购的测定方法。方法:我们验证了TFF1-3的商业化检测方法,并使用供血者血清与我们内部检测结果进行了比较。结果:检测水平为:<0.008 nmol / L。测量范围为:0.032-0.51(TFF1),0.038-0.76(TFF2)和0.019-0.15(TFF3)nmol / L。从两个水平的血清库测量值判断不精确度(CV)低于9%(TFF2和TFF3),但对于TFF1高达18%(平均0.41 nmol / L)。没有观察到TFF之间的交叉反应性(浓度> 100 nmol / L)。 95%的非参数参考间隔为:<0.0032-0.53(TFF1),0.099-1.4(TFF2)和0.086-0.87(TFF3)nmol / L。将商业分析与内部分析(n = 132)进行比较,发现偏差由校正剂(TFF1和TFF2)的差异解释。许多样品显示出明显不同的结果。结论:TFF2和TFF3的商业化验可用于血清样品,而TFF1化验显示不精确性差且测量范围过窄。通过商业化和内部化验获得的结果有所不同,部分原因是所使用的校准品存在差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号