首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cross-cultural psychology >Dreams of Canadian Students: Norms, Gender Differences, and Comparison With American Norms
【24h】

Dreams of Canadian Students: Norms, Gender Differences, and Comparison With American Norms

机译:加拿大学生的梦想:规范,性别差异以及与美国规范的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A total of 600 dream reports were collected from 300 Canadian university students, 150 female and 150 male, and their content analyzed with the Hall and Van de Castle (1966) system of categories. The main dream content categories were characters, aggressive and friendly interactions, positive and negative emotions, and dream outcomes. The main purpose of the analysis was to provide normative data for a large sample of young Canadians to determine (a) whether negative elements prevail over positive ones, as assumed by the threat simulation theory and (b) whether dream gender differences are consistent with differences in waking life, in accordance with the continuity hypothesis. Overall, findings support both theories. The final objective was to compare the Canadian data, relative to gender differences, with normative data established in 1966 with the original American sample. Findings for males and females and gender differences remain consistent with the American normative data for most categories despite a 50 years interval. Similarities in Canadian and American dream content reflect similarities between the respective cultures. They also attest to fundamental structural dimensions of dream content that transcend cultures. Other types of content analysis relative to themes, for instance, might be appropriate to highlight cultural differences.
机译:从300名加拿大大学生,150名女性和150名男性的大学生中收集了600份梦想报告,并使用Hall and Van de Castle(1966)系统对它们的内容进行了分析。梦的主要内容类别是角色,积极进取和友好的互动,积极和消极的情绪以及梦想的结果。分析的主要目的是为大量加拿大年轻人提供规范数据,以确定(a)威胁模拟理论所假设的负面因素是否胜过正面因素,以及(b)梦想的性别差异是否与差异一致根据连续性假设,在唤醒生活中。总体而言,研究结果支持这两种理论。最终目标是将与性别差异有关的加拿大数据与1966年与原始美国样本建立的规范数据进行比较。尽管间隔为50年,但男性和女性的调查结果以及性别差异仍与大多数类别的美国规范数据保持一致。加拿大和美国梦内容的相似之处反映了各自文化之间的相似之处。他们还证明了超越文化的梦境内容的基本结构维度。例如,与主题相关的其他类型的内容分析可能适合强调文化差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号