...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine: CCLM >In vivo and in vitro allergy diagnostics: it's time to re-appraise the costs.
【24h】

In vivo and in vitro allergy diagnostics: it's time to re-appraise the costs.

机译:体内和体外过敏诊断:是时候重新评估成本了。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: The in vivo skin prick test (SPT) is widely considered less expensive than in vitro gamma-immunoglobulin E (IgE) determination in the diagnosis of allergy. The aim of the present paper is to evaluate the relevance of component-resolved in vitro diagnosis in comparison to extract-based diagnosis and the relative global costs in relation to clinical outcomes. METHODS: For 50 individuals with suspected seasonal allergic rhinitis, we compared the costs of skin testing with those of specific IgE antibody measurement. RESULTS: The costs were higher for in vitro than in vivo testing. However, the clinical information obtained using recombinant reagents allowed correct identification of the sensitizing molecule. CONCLUSIONS: Recombinant allergens for specific IgE in vitro measurement provide more reliable information for immunotherapy prescription. This should be translated into a significant reduction in the overall costs sustained by the healthcare system.
机译:背景:在过敏诊断中,体内皮肤点刺试验(SPT)被认为比体外γ-免疫球蛋白E(IgE)测定便宜。本文的目的是评估基于成分的体外诊断与基于提取物的诊断的相关性以及与临床结果相关的相对总体成本。方法:对于50名怀疑患有季节性过敏性鼻炎的人,我们将皮肤测试的成本与特异性IgE抗体测量的成本进行了比较。结果:体外试验的费用高于体内试验的费用。但是,使用重组试剂获得的临床信息可以正确鉴定致敏分子。结论:用于特异性IgE体外测量的重组变应原为免疫疗法处方提供了更可靠的信息。这应转化为医疗系统所承受的总体成本的大幅降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号