...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cystic fibrosis: official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society >A semi-blinded study comparing 2 methods of measuring nasal potential difference: Subcutaneous needle versus dermal abrasion
【24h】

A semi-blinded study comparing 2 methods of measuring nasal potential difference: Subcutaneous needle versus dermal abrasion

机译:半盲研究比较了两种测量鼻电位差的方法:皮下注射针头与真皮磨损

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: According to European and US protocols, two nasal potential difference (NPD) measurement methods are considered acceptable, although they have not been formally compared: subcutaneous agar-filled needle with calomel (Ndl) and dermal abrasion with conducting cream and Ag/AgCl electrodes (Abr). We compared both in CF and healthy volunteers (HV), assessing their discriminative value and subject's preference.
机译:背景:根据欧洲和美国的协议,虽然尚未正式比较两种鼻电位差(NPD)测量方法,但仍可以接受,但它们尚未正式进行比较:皮下填充琼脂糖(Ndl)的琼脂针和使用导电膏和Ag / AgCl的皮肤擦伤电极(Abr)。我们比较了CF和健康志愿者(HV),评估了他们的区分价值和受试者的偏爱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号