首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical densitometry >A generalized least significant change for individuals measured on different DXA systems.
【24h】

A generalized least significant change for individuals measured on different DXA systems.

机译:对于在不同DXA系统上测得的个体而言,广义的最小显着变化。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this article, we derive a generalized expression for the least significant change (LSC), which we call the generalized LSC (GLSC), to be used when an individual is measured on 2 different systems. The commonly used LSC is defined as the least amount of change between 2 measurements over time that must be exceeded before a change can be considered true (with 95% confidence). The LSC has clinical applications in monitoring disease progression or treatment effects in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content. Mathematically, the ideal system. When BMD values of an individual are measured by 2 different systems, the LSC will depend not only on the precision errors of both systems but also on the calibration relationship between the systems. Like the ILSC, the GLSC is a simple equation applicable for inter machine comparisons. The GLSC can be defined for any 2 systems with measures obtained from cross-calibration and precision studies using the protocols recommended by the International Societyfor Clinical Densitometry. We validated the GLSC using 10,000 simulated measurements taken between 2 systems and offer several common uses of the GLSC such as system upgrades within a single manufacturer and replacement of 1 manufacturer by another. We found that when upgrading a Hologic QDR-2000 to a QDR-4500, GLSC was twice as large as the QDR-2000 LSC (0.0432 and 0.0215 g/cm2, respectively). The GLSC was 2.6 (spine) to 3.6 (total hip) times larger than the LSC when comparing scans between the Hologic Delphi and the GE Lunar Prodigy. We also explore how the magnitude of the correlation coefficient and sample size change the GLSC and show that a correlation coefficient less than 0.95 increases the %GLSC to above 10%, and that increasing study sample sizes beyond 30 in the cross-calibration studies can only decrease the magnitude of the GLSC accuracy by 4%. We conclude that the GLSC, defined using commonly used clinical cross-calibration and precision assessments, is the most accurate method to compare scans between dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry systems.
机译:在本文中,我们导出了最小有效变化(LSC)的广义表达式,我们将其称为广义LSC(GLSC),用于在2个不同系统上对一个人进行测量时使用。常用的LSC定义为在两次测量之间随时间变化的最小变化量,必须先超过该变化,然后才能将其视为正确(置信度为95%)。 LSC在监视疾病进展或骨矿物质密度(BMD)和骨矿物质含量的治疗效果方面具有临床应用。数学上是理想的系统。当一个人的BMD值由2个不同的系统测量时,LSC不仅取决于两个系统的精度误差,还取决于系统之间的校准关系。像ILSC一样,GLSC是适用于机器间比较的简单方程式。 GLSC可以使用国际临床密度测定学会推荐的方案通过交叉校准和精密度研究获得的方法定义为任意两种系统。我们使用在2个系统之间进行的10,000次模拟测量对GLSC进行了验证,并提供了GLSC的几种常用用法,例如,单个制造商内部的系统升级和另一制造商的替代。我们发现,将Hologic QDR-2000升级到QDR-4500时,GLSC的大小是QDR-2000 LSC的两倍(分别为0.0432和0.0215 g / cm2)。比较Hologic Delphi和GE Lunar Prodigy的扫描结果时,GLSC比LSC大2.6倍(脊柱)至3.6倍(全髋关节)。我们还探讨了相关系数的大小和样本量如何改变GLSC,并表明,相关系数小于0.95会使%GLSC增至10%以上,并且在交叉校准研究中将研究样本量增加到30以上只能将GLSC精度的幅度降低4%。我们得出结论,使用常用的临床交叉校准和精确度评估定义的GLSC是比较双能X射线吸收仪系统之间扫描的最准确方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号