【24h】

Sex differences and response styles: subtypes of rumination and associations with depressive symptoms.

机译:性别差异和反应方式:反刍的亚型和与抑郁症状的关联。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In view of recent findings regarding the multifaceted nature of rumination in adults and older adolescents, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the construct of rumination as a 2-factor model (brooding and reflection) in a child and early adolescent sample as well as examine sex differences and associations between depressive symptoms and these ruminative subtypes. Participants were children in 2nd through 7th grades (N = 303). Results of a confirmatory factor analysis supported the hypothesis that subtypes of rumination (2-factor model) are present in children and provided a better fit than a unitary construct of rumination (1-factor model). As predicted, girls endorsed higher levels of brooding than boys, and brooding (not reflection) was uniquely related to depressive symptoms. Results revealed that a distinction between brooding and reflection subtypes is warranted as it can help lead to better assessment and identification of risk factors of depression.
机译:鉴于最近有关成年人和老年青少年反刍的多面性的发现,本研究的目的是评估儿童和青春期早期样本中反刍的构建作为两因素模型(育雏和反思)的基础,以及检查性别差异以及抑郁症状与这些反刍动物亚型之间的关联。参加者是2至7年级的儿童(N = 303)。验证性因子分析的结果支持以下假设:儿童存在反刍作用亚型(2因子模型),并且比单一的反刍构建体(1因子模型)更适合。正如预测的那样,女孩对育雏的认可程度高于男孩,而育雏(而不是反思)与抑郁症状有着独特的关系。结果表明,有必要区分沉思和反射亚型,因为它可以帮助更好地评估和确定抑郁症的危险因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号