...
【24h】

Replication and External Validation of a Bi-Factor Parameterization of Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Symptomatology

机译:注意缺陷/多动症状的双因素参数化的复制和外部验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This study evaluated the fit and criterion validity of a recently proposed bi-factor structure for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms. Participants were 1,093 children, drawn from an ongoing prospective longitudinal study, whose ADHD symptoms were rated by parents and teachers when children were in 1st grade. The criterion validity of the bi-factor model was established using a range of school-based outcomes that included treatment utilization, teacher perceptions of the need for treatment, academic functioning, and peer and teacher relationship quality. Results indicated that a bi-factor model parameterization provided an equally good fit to parent, teacher, and combined reports of ADHD symptoms as did traditional 1-, 2-, and 3-factor models. However, in contrast to traditional models, the bi-factor parameterization acknowledged both the unity and diversity of ADHD symptoms. The general ADHD latent factor explained the vast majority of the observed variation in every symptom. Whereas the general ADHD latent factor was significantly associated with all 15 outcomes, the specific Inattentive factor explained unique variation in 9 (primarily the academically oriented) outcomes and the specific Hyperactive-Impulsive factor explained unique variation in 2 outcomes. The general ADHD factor was more strongly correlated with each of the observed ADHD symptom scores (total, inattentive, hyperactive-impulsive) than was either specific factor. Results are discussed with respect to how changes in the conceptualization of the factor structure correspond to recent changes to the diagnostic criteria for ADHD, as well as whether/how individual differences in inattention and hyperactivity-impulsivity might be used to differentiate children who are diagnosed with ADHD.
机译:这项研究评估了最近提出的双因素结构对注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)症状的拟合和标准有效性。参加者是来自正在进行的一项前瞻性纵向研究的1,093名儿童,当儿童处于一年级时,其多动症症状由父母和老师评定。双因素模型的标准有效性是根据一系列基于学校的结果建立的,包括治疗的利用,教师对治疗需求的看法,学术功能以及同伴和教师之间的关系质量。结果表明,双因素模型参数化与传统的1、2和3因素模型一样,对ADHD症状的家长,教师和合并报告的拟合程度均相同。但是,与传统模型相比,双因素参数化承认ADHD症状的统一性和多样性。一般的ADHD潜在因素解释了每种症状中观察到的绝大多数变化。普通的ADHD潜在因素与所有15个结果均显着相关,特定的不注意因素解释了9个(主要是以学术为导向)结果的独特变化,特定的多动冲动因素解释了2个结果的独特变化。与任一特定因素相比,一般ADHD因子与每个观察到的ADHD症状评分(总得分,注意力不集中,冲动过度)的相关性更高。讨论了有关以下方面的结果:因素结构的概念变化如何与多动症诊断标准的最新变化相对应,以及是否/如何将注意力不集中和冲动过度的个体差异用于区分被诊断出患有多动症的儿童多动症。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号