首页> 外文期刊>Journal of chromatography, A: Including electrophoresis and other separation methods >Extraction of rotenone from Derris elliptica and Derris malaccensis by pressurized liquid extraction compared with maceration
【24h】

Extraction of rotenone from Derris elliptica and Derris malaccensis by pressurized liquid extraction compared with maceration

机译:加压浸提与浸渍法提取椭圆藻和马来酸鱼中鱼藤酮的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The extraction of active compounds from plants is one of the most critical steps in the commercial development of natural products for medicinal, herbicidal or pesticidal use. The focus of this study was to compare conventional maceration and pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) techniques for the efficient extraction of rotenone from the stem and root of Derris elliptica Benth and Derris malaccensis Prain. The effects of experimental variables, such as solvent, temperature and pressure, on PLE efficiency have been studied. Chloroform was determined to be a good extraction solvent (rotenone content 40.6%, w/w) compared to commonly used solvent, 95% ethanol (rotenone content 15.0%, w/w). The optimal conditions for PLE were 50 degrees C and 2000 psi. PLE showed higher extraction efficiency (rotenone content 46.1%, w/w) as compared with conventional maceration method (rotenone content 40.6%, w/w). The order of rotenone content found in crude extract obtained by optimized method from the highest to the lowest was root (46.1%, w/w) and stem (9.4%, w/w) of D. elliptica and stem of D. malaccensis (5.2%, w/w), respectively. Moreover, the results from this study indicated that PLE was considerably less time and solvent consuming (30 min, 3 ml/g of dried sample) than the conventional maceration techniques (72 h, 10 ml/g of dried sample). (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:从植物中提取活性化合物是用于药用,除草或杀虫的天然产品商业开发中最关键的步骤之一。这项研究的重点是比较常规浸软和加压液体萃取(PLE)技术,以有效地从椭圆形贝氏菌和马六甲藻的茎和根中提取鱼藤酮。研究了实验变量(例如溶剂,温度和压力)对PLE效率的影响。与常用溶剂95%乙醇(鱼藤酮含量15.0%,w / w)相比,氯仿被确定为良好的萃取溶剂(鱼藤酮含量为40.6%,w / w)。 PLE的最佳条件是50摄氏度和2000 psi。与传统的浸渍法(鱼藤酮含量为40.6%,w / w)相比,PLE显示出更高的提取效率(鱼藤酮含量为46.1%,w / w)。通过优化方法获得的粗提物中鱼藤酮含量从最高到最低的顺序是椭圆形衣原体的根(46.1%,w / w)和茎(9.4%,w / w)和马六甲(D. malaccensis)的茎(分别为5.2%(w / w)。此外,这项研究的结果表明,PLE的时间和溶剂消耗(30分钟,3 ml / g干燥样品)比常规浸渍技术(72 h,10 ml / g干燥样品)要少得多。 (c)2006 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号