...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of chromatography, A: Including electrophoresis and other separation methods >A microplate solid scintillation counter as a radioactivity detector for high performance liquid chromatography in drug metabolism: Validation and applications
【24h】

A microplate solid scintillation counter as a radioactivity detector for high performance liquid chromatography in drug metabolism: Validation and applications

机译:微孔板固体闪烁计数器作为放射性检测器,用于药物代谢中的高效液相色谱法:验证和应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Sensitive radioactivity detection following high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) separation remains a challenge in many drug metabolism studies with radiolabeled compounds. In this work, solid scintillation counting (SSC) after fraction collection into 96-well plates was evaluated as an off-line radioactivity detection method, in comparison with conventional liquid scintillation counting (LSC). The impact of counting time and biological matrix on the quantification of radiolabeled metabolites and parent drug in samples from animal and human absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) studies was investigated. Three different approaches were used to test whether reliable quantification by off-line SSC detection, which requires an approximately constant counting yield during the entire chromatographic run, can be realized: (i) the measurement of radioactivity-spiked biological blank samples without HPLC separation as an extreme case of biological background, (ii) the measurement of radioactivity-spiked HPLC fractions of biological blank samples and (iii) the comparison of radiochromatograms obtained by off-line SSC and LSC of real samples from ADME studies with radiolabeled compounds. Situations in which variations in SSC yield during an HPLC run are likely to lead to significant errors in quantitation were identified and are discussed. However, examples from a number of animal or human ADME studies showed that in the majority of cases off-line SSC provides very similar quantitative data, compared with the reference method of off-line LSC radioactivity detection. Approaches for validation of the off-line SSC approach in critical cases are discussed. The main advantages of off-line SSC, compared with off-line LSC, are lower detection limits and a substantially higher throughput. Several applications of off-line SSC detection in ADME studies are shown. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在许多使用放射性标记化合物进行的药物代谢研究中,高效液相色谱(HPLC)分离后的灵敏放射性检测仍然是一个挑战。在这项工作中,与常规液体闪烁计数(LSC)相比,将馏分收集到96孔板中后的固体闪烁计数(SSC)作为离线放射性检测方法进行了评估。研究了计数时间和生物基质对动物和人类吸收,分布,代谢和排泄(ADME)研究样品中放射性标记的代谢物和母体药物定量的影响。可以使用三种不同的方法来测试是否可以实现通过离线SSC检测进行可靠的定量,而这需要在整个色谱运行过程中保持近似恒定的计数产量:一个极端的生物学背景,(ii)测量生物空白样品的放射加标HPLC馏分,以及(iii)通过离线SSC和LSC对来自ADME研究的真实样品与放射性标记化合物获得的放射性色谱图进行比较。确定并讨论了在HPLC运行期间SSC产量变化可能导致定量错误的情况。但是,来自许多动物或人类ADME研究的例子表明,与离线LSC放射性检测的参考方法相比,离线SSC在大多数情况下可提供非常相似的定量数据。讨论了在关键情况下验证离线SSC方法的方法。与离线LSC相比,离线SSC的主要优点是更低的检测极限和更高的吞吐量。显示了离线SSC检测在ADME研究中的几种应用。 (c)2006 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号