首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Chromatographic Science >Comparison and Analysis of Organochlorine Pesticides and Hexabromobiphenyls in Environmental Samples by Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry
【24h】

Comparison and Analysis of Organochlorine Pesticides and Hexabromobiphenyls in Environmental Samples by Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry

机译:气相色谱-电子捕获检测器和气相色谱-质谱法对环境样品中的有机氯农药和六溴代二苯进行比较和分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two analytical methods, gas chromatography-electron capture detector (GC-ECD) and gas chromatography-negative chemical ionization-mass spectrometry (GC-NCI-MS), were evaluated and compared for the measurement of persistent organic pollutants, specifically for 26 organochlorine pesticides and two hexabromobiphenyls, in atmospheric particulate matter and soil samples. The hypothesis tested was that the coelution of non-target compounds may lead to false positives when analyzed by GC-ECD, and that the overestimation associated with these false positives can be eliminated using GC-NCI-MS. The study showed that both methods had satisfactory linearity and reproducibility for the target compounds. Although the sensitivities of GC-ECD for most of the compounds investigated were higher than those observed with the GC-NCI-MS method, the matrices interference was obvious with GC-ECD. There was indeed an apparently high false-positive rate or overestimate when GC-ECD was used for environmental samples, implying that the GC-ECD method has been used with care and that GC-NCI-MS is generally superior for the analysis of trace amounts of these compounds in environmental samples. Based on these results, the sample extraction and cleanup procedures of the GC-NCI-MS method were optimized for achieving acceptable recoveries and less matrices interference.
机译:评估了两种分析方法,气相色谱-电子捕获检测器(GC-ECD)和气相色谱-负化学电离质谱(GC-NCI-MS),用于测量持久性有机污染物,特别是26种有机氯农药大气颗粒物和土壤样品中的两种六溴代二苯。测试的假设是,通过GC-ECD分析时,非目标化合物的共洗脱可能会导致假阳性,并且可以使用GC-NCI-MS消除与这些假阳性相关的高估。研究表明两种方法对目标化合物均具有令人满意的线性和重现性。尽管大多数所研究化合物的GC-ECD灵敏度都比用GC-NCI-MS方法观察到的灵敏度高,但GC-ECD对基质的干扰却很明显。当将GC-ECD用于环境样品时,确实确实存在较高的假阳性率或过高估计,这意味着GC-ECD方法已被谨慎使用,并且GC-NCI-MS通常在痕量分析方面更胜一筹这些化合物在环境样品中的含量。根据这些结果,对GC-NCI-MS方法的样品提取和净化程序进行了优化,以实现可接受的回收率并减少基质干扰。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号