...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Chromatographic Science >Comparative Study of Sample Preparation Techniques Coupled to GC for the Analysis of Halogenated Acetic Acids (HAAs) Acids in TapWater
【24h】

Comparative Study of Sample Preparation Techniques Coupled to GC for the Analysis of Halogenated Acetic Acids (HAAs) Acids in TapWater

机译:样品制备技术与GC联用分析自来水中卤代乙酸(HAAs)酸的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Halogenated acetic acids (HAAs) are one of the most common disinfection by-products formed during chlorination of drinking water. Currently, there are three U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-approved methods for analysis of HAAs in drinking water: U.S. EPA method 552.2, Standard Method 6251, and U.S. EPA method 552.3. The current U.S.EPA-approved HAA analysis methods require tedious and time-consuming liquid–liquid extraction (LLE) and the use of hazardous chemicals. Besides U.S. EPA methods, capillary electrophoresis (CE), liquid chromatography (LC), including ion chromatography (IC), and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) have been applied in order to determine the HAAs in portable water with high detection limits. Detection limits required to analyze portable water samples can be regularly achieved only by gas chromatography–electron capture detector (ECD) and ESI-MS. In this study, improved gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) method was able to achieve HAAs analysis at low detection limits. Thus, a safe and rapid method is needed for the micro-determination of HAAs. A method involving solid-phase extraction (SPE) followed by GC–MS was developed to determine the HAAs in tap water. Selectivity, percent recovery, and detection limit studies were carried out on a LC–SAX (quaternary ammonium anion exchanger) SPE. Under optimized conditions, average recoveries for all nine HAAs spiked in drinking water samples ranged from 78.7% to 100%. The relative standard deviation data was found to range from 1.0% to 12.5% based upon five repeat recovery experiments, and estimated detection limit ranging between 0.16–0.009 μg/L was obtained. On this basis, SPE was studied as a possible alternative to LLE for the analysis of HAAs in water. Finally, the performance of the SPEGC– MS with spiked drinking water samples was tested, and the results were compared with those obtained using LLE-GC–ECD. The method was applied for determination of HAAs in drinking water and water samples.
机译:卤代乙酸(HAAs)是饮用水氯化过程中形成的最常见的消毒副产物之一。当前,有三种由美国环境保护署批准的用于分析饮用水中HAAs的方法:美国EPA方法552.2,标准方法6251和美国EPA方法552.3。当前美国EPA批准的HAA分析方法要求乏味且耗时的液-液萃取(LLE)和使用危险化学品。除美国EPA方法外,毛细管电泳(CE),液相色谱法(LC)(包括离子色谱法(IC))和电喷雾电离质谱(ESI-MS)已被应用,以测定具有高检出限的便携式水中的HAA 。只有通过气相色谱-电子捕获检测器(ECD)和ESI-MS才能定期达到分析便携式水样所需的检测限。在这项研究中,改进的气相色谱-质谱法(GC-MS)能够在低检测限下实现HAAs分析。因此,需要一种安全,快速的方法来微量测定HAA。开发了一种包括固相萃取(SPE)和GC-MS的方法来测定自来水中的HAAs。在LC–SAX(季铵阴离子交换剂)SPE上进行了选择性,回收率和检测限的研究。在优化条件下,饮用水样品中全部九种HAA的平均回收率在78.7%至100%之间。根据五次重复回收实验,发现相对标准偏差数据范围为1.0%至12.5%,估计的检出限为0.16-0.009μg/ L。在此基础上,对固相萃取进行了研究,认为它可以替代LLE,用于分析水中的HAAs。最后,测试了加标饮用水样品的SPEGC-MS的性能,并将结果与​​使用LLE-GC-ECD获得的结果进行了比较。该方法用于饮用水和水样中HAAs的测定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号