...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical laboratory analysis. >The Diagnostic Value and performance evaluation of five serological tests for the detection of treponema pallidum
【24h】

The Diagnostic Value and performance evaluation of five serological tests for the detection of treponema pallidum

机译:五种血清学检测对梅毒螺旋体的诊断价值和性能评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Syphilis is caused by the bacterium Treponema pallidum (TP). The aim of this study was to establish a clinical approach for serodiagnosis of syphilis by evaluating the performance and diagnostic value of five serological tests for the detection of TP. Methods: Five tests were used to test the serum from syphilis patients and control patients, namely rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test, toluidine red unheated serum test (TRUST), TP passive particle agglutination assay (TPPA), TP-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (TP-ELISA), and TP-specific chemiluminescent immunoassay (TP-CMIA). Results: The sensitivity and diagnostic efficiency of TPPA (96.25%/98.38%), TP-ELISA (100%/95.41%), and TP-CMIA (100%/94.86%) were significantly higher than that of RPR (73.13%/86.22%) and TRUST (73.75%/86.49%) (P < 0.05). The minimum detectable concentrations for the five tests were 30 mIU/ml, 20 mIU/ml, 15 mIU/ml, 150 mIU/ml, and 150 mIU/ml, respectively. According to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the optimal cut-off values for syphilis diagnosis by TP-CMIA and TP-ELISA were 2.2 and 2.0 S/CO (where S/CO = Sample/calibrator cut off), and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) were 0.998 for TP-CMIA and 0.999 for TP-ELISA. The titers/positive rates for RPR and TRUST dropped from 1:4 (100%) to 1:1 (23.3%) (both P < 0.05) after treatment. However, there were no significant differences when we compared the positive rate of syphilis patients before and after treatment by TPPA, TP-ELISA, and TP-CMIA. Conclusions: Treponemal tests, such as TPPA, TP-ELISA, and TP-CMIA, are recommended for clinical routine screening of syphilis. However, nontreponemal tests, for example, RPR and TRUST, perform better in therapy response assessment. Serological test should be tailored to respective facilities and clinical demands.
机译:背景:梅毒是由梅毒螺旋体(TP)引起的。这项研究的目的是通过评估五种血清学检测TP的性能和诊断价值来建立梅毒血清学诊断的临床方法。方法:采用五项测试对梅毒患者和对照患者的血清进行测试,即快速血浆再造血(RPR)测试,甲苯胺红未加热血清测试(TRUST),TP被动颗粒凝集测定(TPPA),TP特异性酶联免疫吸附测定(TP-ELISA)和TP特异性化学发光免疫测定(TP-CMIA)。结果:TPPA(96.25%/ 98.38%),TP-ELISA(100%/ 95.41%)和TP-CMIA(100%/ 94.86%)的敏感性和诊断效率显着高于RPR(73.13%/ 86.22%)和TRUST(73.75%/ 86.49%)(P <0.05)。五个测试的最低可检测浓度分别为30 mIU / ml,20 mIU / ml,15 mIU / ml,150 mIU / ml和150 mIU / ml。根据接收器工作特性(ROC)曲线,通过TP-CMIA和TP-ELISA进行梅毒诊断的最佳截断值是2.2和2.0 S / CO(其中S / CO =样本/校准物截断),并且面积TP-CMIA的ROC曲线(AUC)值为0.998,TP-ELISA的值为0.999。治疗后,RPR和TRUST的滴度/阳性率从1:4(100%)降至1:1(23.3%)(均P <0.05)。但是,当我们比较TPPA,TP-ELISA和TP-CMIA治疗前后梅毒患者的阳性率时,没有显着差异。结论:建议对梅毒进行常规例行筛查,例如TPPA,TP-ELISA和TP-CMIA。但是,非椎板测试,例如RPR和TRUST,在治疗反应评估中表现更好。血清学测试应根据各自的设施和临床需求量身定制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号