...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine: CCLM >Allergy testing on the IMMULITE 2000 Random-Access immunoanalyzer - a clinical evaluation study.
【24h】

Allergy testing on the IMMULITE 2000 Random-Access immunoanalyzer - a clinical evaluation study.

机译:在IMMULITE 2000 Random-Access免疫分析仪上进行过敏测试-临床评估研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the IMMULITE 2000 Allergy System from Diagnostic Products Corporation (DPC) for the detection of inhalant and food allergies, focusing on inhalant and food screens, mixes and single allergens. METHODS: Serum samples were collected from new, unselected patients who were referred to the allergist for a suspected allergy. Patients were classified as study diagnosis-positive for inhalant (food) allergy if they had both a positive clinical examination/history and a positive skin test for inhalant (food) allergy; otherwise - failing one or both of these criteria - they were classified as study diagnosis-negative. Classification and testing of the serum samples was carried out in a blinded fashion. Values greater than 0.35 kU/L were considered positive. RESULTS: Of the 118 patients included, 63 were considered study diagnosis-positive for inhalation and/or food allergy. DPC inhalation screening showed 82% total agreement (TA) and 91% sensitivity relative to the study diagnoses. The DPC food panel showed 96% TA and 98% specificity relative to the study diagnoses. Relative to specific intracutaneous testing (ICT), the DPC D1, E1 and E5 assays had sensitivity of 82-90%; tree and grass panels had sensitivity of 74% and 95%. The DPC weed panel and initial lots of DPC E5 had poor sensitivity (<40%); mold panel sensitivity was equally low for both DPC and the routinely used Pharmacia assay (36%). Relative to skin prick testing (SPT), specific food allergens had TA of 94-98% and specificity of 95-100%. CONCLUSION: In patients classified by the combination of clinical examination/history and skin test results, the DPC IMMULITE 2000 Allergy System generally demonstrated acceptable sensitivity, specificity and TA compared to the study diagnoses, both at the screening level and at the level of panels and single allergens.
机译:目的:我们旨在评估诊断产品公司(DPC)的IMMULITE 2000过敏系统在检测吸入性和食物过敏方面的诊断性能,重点是吸入性和食物筛查,混合物和单一过敏原。方法:从未选择的新患者中收集血清样本,这些患者因怀疑为过敏而转诊至过敏科。如果患者的吸入(食物)过敏临床检查/病史阳性和皮肤试验阳性,则被分类为吸入(食物)过敏的研究诊断阳性;否则-不能满足这两个标准中的一个或两个-将它们分类为研究诊断阴性。以盲法进行血清样品的分类和测试。大于0.35 kU / L的值被认为是阳性。结果:在118名患者中,有63名被认为对吸入和/或食物过敏的研究诊断为阳性。相对于研究诊断,DPC吸入筛查显示总同意(TA)为82%,敏感性为91%。相对于研究诊断,DPC食品小组显示出96%的TA和98%的特异性。相对于特定的皮内测试(ICT),DPC D1,E1和E5检测的灵敏度为82-90%;树木和草板的敏感度分别为74%和95%。 DPC杂草板和最初的DPC E5批次灵敏度差(<40%);对于DPC和常规使用的Pharmacia分析,模具面板的灵敏度同样较低(36%)。相对于皮肤点刺试验(SPT),特定食物过敏原的TA为94-98%,特异性为95-100%。结论:根据临床检查/病史和皮肤测试结果进行分类的患者,与研究诊断相比,DPC IMMULITE 2000过敏系统在筛查水平,面板水平和筛查水平均普遍显示可接受的敏感性,特异性和TA。单一过敏原。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号