...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design >Free-energy perturbation and quantum mechanical study of SAMPL4 octa-acid host-guest binding energies
【24h】

Free-energy perturbation and quantum mechanical study of SAMPL4 octa-acid host-guest binding energies

机译:SAMPL4八酸主客体结合能的自由能摄动和量子力学研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We have estimated free energies for the binding of nine cyclic carboxylate guest molecules to the octa-acid host in the SAMPL4 blind-test challenge with four different approaches. First, we used standard free-energy perturbation calculations of relative binding affinities, performed at the molecular-mechanics (MM) level with TIP3P waters, the GAFF force field, and two different sets of charges for the host and the guest, obtained either with the restrained electrostatic potential or AM1-BCC methods. Both charge sets give good and nearly identical results, with a mean absolute deviation (MAD) of 4 kJ/mol and a correlation coefficient (R~2) of 0.8 compared to experimental results. Second, we tried to improve these predictions with 28,800 densityfunctional theory (DFT) calculations for selected snapshots and the non-Boltzmann Bennett acceptance-ratio method, but this led to much worse results, probably because of a too large difference between theMM and DFT potential-energy functions. Third, we tried to calculate absolute affinities using minimised DFT structures. This gave intermediatequality results with MADs of 5-9 kJ/mol and R~2=0.6-0.8, depending on how the structures were obtained. Finally, we tried to improve these results using local coupled-cluster calculations with single and double excitations, and noniterative perturbative treatment of triple excitations (LCCSD(T0)), employing the polarisable multipole interactions with supermolecular pairs approach. Unfortunately, this only degraded the predictions, probably because of a mismatch between the solvation energies obtained at the DFT and LCCSD(T0) levels.
机译:我们已经用四种不同的方法估计了九种环状羧酸盐客体分子与SAMPL4盲法试验挑战中的八酸宿主结合的自由能。首先,我们使用相对结合亲和力的标准自由能扰动计算,在分子力学(MM)级别上对TIP3P水,GAFF力场以及主机和客体的两组不同电荷进行计算,分别通过抑制静电势或AM1-BCC方法。与实验结果相比,两种电荷组均给出了良好且几乎相同的结果,平均绝对偏差(MAD)为4 kJ / mol,相关系数(R〜2)为0.8。其次,我们尝试通过对选定快照使用28,800密度泛函理论(DFT)计算和非Boltzmann Bennett接受比率方法来改善这些预测,但这可能导致更差的结果,这可能是因为MM和DFT电位之间的差异太大能量功能。第三,我们尝试使用最小化的DFT结构来计算绝对亲和力。这给出了中等质量的结果,MAD为5-9 kJ / mol,R〜2 = 0.6-0.8,具体取决于如何获得结构。最后,我们尝试使用具有单分子和多分子对的可极化多极相互作用,通过单和双激发的局部耦合簇计算以及三激发的非迭代扰动处理(LCCSD(T0))来改善这些结果。不幸的是,这仅会使预测变差,这可能是由于在DFT和LCCSD(T0)水平获得的溶剂化能之间不匹配。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号