首页> 外文期刊>Journal of computer assisted tomography >Left ventricular functional analysis with 16- and 64-row multidetector computed tomography: comparison with gated single-photon emission computed tomography.
【24h】

Left ventricular functional analysis with 16- and 64-row multidetector computed tomography: comparison with gated single-photon emission computed tomography.

机译:左心功能分析与16和64行多探测器计算机断层扫描:与门控单光子发射计算机断层扫描的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare the left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF), end-diastolic volume (EDV), and end-systolic volume (ESV) from electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography (CT) to gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). METHODS: Fifty-seven patients underwent electrocardiogram-gated multidetector CT and SPECT examinations within a 3-month period, without interim cardiac events. The LV EF, EDV, and ESV were compared. RESULTS: There was an excellent correlation between LV EF obtained from CT (60.25% +/- 12.93%) and SPECT (61.90% +/- 14.93%) (r = 0.81), with no significant difference (P = 0.17). Computed tomography-derived EDV and ESV correlated well with SPECT (r = 0.88 and 0.94, respectively). The EDV from SPECT (132.21 +/- 67.10 mL) was significantly lower than that from CT (147.53 +/- 55.03 mL; P = 0.0007); there was a trend for ESV from SPECT (58.39 +/- 61.20 mL) to be lower than that from CT (63.79 +/- 53.58 mL; P = 0.055). The EF, EDV, and ESV correlation of SPECT with the 64-row multidetector CT was better (r = 0.87, 0.89, and 0.96, respectively) than that with the 16-row CT (r = 0.36, 0.66, and 0.49, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There is a good correlation between LV EF, EDV, and ESV from gated SPECT and CT (particularly the 64-row CT). The LV volumes are lower on SPECT than on CT.
机译:目的:比较心电图门控计算机断层扫描(CT)与门控单光子发射计算机断层扫描(左)的左心室射血分数(EF),舒张末期容积(EDV)和收缩末期容积(ESV)( SPECT)。方法:57例患者在3个月内接受了心电门控的多探测器CT和SPECT检查,没有发生临时性心脏事件。比较了LV EF,EDV和ESV。结果:CT获得的LV EF(60.25%+/- 12.93%)与SPECT(61.90%+/- 14.93%)之间存在极好的相关性(r = 0.81),差异无统计学意义(P = 0.17)。计算机断层扫描得出的EDV和ESV与SPECT密切相关(分别为r = 0.88和0.94)。 SPECT(132.21 +/- 67.10 mL)的EDV显着低于CT(147.53 +/- 55.03 mL; P = 0.0007); SPECT(58.39 +/- 61.20 mL)的ESV趋势低于CT(63.79 +/- 53.58 mL; P = 0.055)。 SPECT与64行多探测器CT的EF,EDV和ESV相关性(分别为r = 0.87、0.89和0.96)比16行CT(r = 0.36、0.66和0.49)更好)。结论:门控SPECT和CT(尤其是64行CT)的LV EF,EDV和ESV之间存在良好的相关性。 SPECT上的LV容积比CT上的低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号