...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical gastroenterology >A multicenter, multiyear, case-controlled study of the risk of colonic polyps in patients with gastric polyps. Are gastric adenomas a new indication for surveillance colonoscopy?
【24h】

A multicenter, multiyear, case-controlled study of the risk of colonic polyps in patients with gastric polyps. Are gastric adenomas a new indication for surveillance colonoscopy?

机译:一项针对胃息肉患者结肠息肉风险的多中心,多年病例对照研究。胃腺瘤是否是监测结肠镜检查的新适应症?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A multicenter, multiyear, case-controlled colonoscopic study of 41 patients with gastric polyps undergoing colonoscopy analyzed whether patients with gastric polyps, particularly adenomas, run an increased risk of having colonic polyps. The primary controls were 109 patients undergoing colonoscopy matched for age and colonoscopy indications. A secondary control group was 69 of these 109 patients who, in addition to matching for age and colonoscopy indications with study patients, had no gastric polyps demonstrated by upper gastrointestinal examination. Patients with nonmalignant mucosal gastric polyps had a significantly greater incidence than primary controls of colonic polyps [odds ratio (OR) = 3.19, OR confidence interval = 1.46 - 6.99, p < 0.004, chi(2)], colonic neoplasms (OR = 3.58, OR confidence interval = 1.56 - 8.23, p < 0.006, chi(2)), and colonic cancer (OR = 4.5, OR confidence interval = 1.05 - 19.4, p < 0.04, Fisher's exact test). Moreover, patients with gastric adenomas had a significantly greater incidence than did primary controls of colonic polyps (OR = 7.6, OR confidence interval = 1.29 - 44.7, p < 0.02, Fisher's exact test). The association between gastric and colonic polyps did not arise as an artifact of the significantly higher frequency of females in the study group because this association remained after patient stratification by sex. The higher risk of colonic polyps in study patients did not arise as an artifact of unappreciated gastric polyps in the primary controls because study patients also had a significantly higher risk of colonic polyps than the secondary controls (OR = 3.21, OR confidence interval = 1.35 - 7.63, p , 0.01, chi(2). Our retrospective case-controlled study suggests that gastric adenomas may be a new, significant risk factor for colonic polyps. A strong association would require that patients with gastric adenomas undergo surveillance colonoscopy to diagnose and remove colonic polyps. However, before we apply this finding to clinical practice, the apparent association should be confirmed by another, preferably prospective study.
机译:一项对41名胃息肉患者进行结肠镜检查的多中心,多年期病例对照结肠镜检查研究分析了胃息肉,特别是腺瘤患者是否患结肠息肉的风险增加。主要对照是109例接受结肠镜检查的患者,其年龄和结肠镜检查指征相匹配。 109名患者中有69名是次要对照组,除了年龄和结肠镜检查适应症与研究患者相匹配外,上消化道检查也未发现胃息肉。非恶性粘膜胃息肉患者的发生率明显高于结肠息肉的原发对照[几率(OR)= 3.19,OR置信区间= 1.46-6.99,p <0.004,chi(2)],结肠肿瘤(OR = 3.58 ,或置信区间= 1.56-8.23,p <0.006,chi(2))和结肠癌(或= 4.5,或置信区间= 1.05-19.4,p <0.04,Fisher精确检验)。此外,胃腺瘤患者的发生率明显高于结肠息肉的主要对照(OR = 7.6,OR置信区间= 1.29-44.7,p <0.02,Fisher精确检验)。胃息肉和结肠息肉之间的关联并未出现在研究组中,因为女性在性别上分层后仍然显着较高,这是女性出现频率较高的假象。在主要对照人群中,未发现胃息肉的假象不会导致研究患者较高的结肠息肉风险,因为与第二个对照相比,研究患者的结肠息肉风险也显着较高(OR = 3.21,OR置信区间= 1.35- 7.63,p,0.01,chi(2)。我们的回顾性病例对照研究表明,胃腺瘤可能是结肠息肉的一个新的重要危险因素,密切的联系将要求胃腺瘤患者接受结肠镜检查以诊断和清除。但是,在将这一发现应用于临床之前,应通过另一项(最好是前瞻性)研究来确认明显的关联。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号