...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of consulting and clinical psychology >A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy and a Group Version of Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy for Chronically Depressed Patients
【24h】

A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy and a Group Version of Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy for Chronically Depressed Patients

机译:基于正念的认知疗法和慢性抑郁症患者心理治疗认知行为分析系统分组版的随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) has recently been proposed as a treatment option for chronic depression. The cognitive behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy (CBASP) is the only approach specifically developed to date for the treatment of chronically depressed patients. The efficacy of MBCT plus treatment-as-usual (TAU), and CBASP (group version) plus TAU, was compared to TAU alone in a prospective, bicenter, randomized controlled trial. Method: One hundred and six patients with a current DSM-IV defined major depressive episode and persistent depressive symptoms for more than 2 years were randomized to TAU only (N = 35), or to TAU with additional 8-week group therapy of either 8 sessions of MBCT (n = 36) or CBASP (n = 35). The primary outcome measure was the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (24-item HAM-D, Hamilton, 1967) at the end of treatment. Secondary outcome measures were the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI; Beck, Steer, & Brown, 1996) and measures of social functioning and quality of life. Results: In the overall sample as well as at 1 treatment site, MBCT was no more effective than TAU in reducing depressive symptoms, although it was significantly superior to TAU at the other treatment site. CBASP was significantly more effective than TAU in reducing depressive symptoms in the overall sample and at both treatment sites. Both treatments had only small to medium effects on social functioning and quality of life. Conclusions: Further studies should inquire whether the superiority of CBASP in this trial might be explained by the more active, problem-solving, and interpersonal focus of CBASP.
机译:目的:基于正念的认知疗法(MBCT)最近被提出作为慢性抑郁症的治疗选择。心理疗法的认知行为分析系统(CBASP)是迄今为止专门开发的用于治疗慢性抑郁症患者的唯一方法。在一项前瞻性,双中心,随机对照试验中,将MBCT加常规治疗(TAU)和CBASP(组版)加TAU的疗效与单独使用TAU进行了比较。方法:将106名当前DSM-IV定义为重度抑郁发作和持续性抑郁症状持续2年以上的患者随机分配至仅TAU(N = 35)或接受TAU并另加8周组治疗8 MBCT(n = 36)或CBASP(n = 35)。主要结局指标为治疗结束时的汉密尔顿抑郁量表(24项HAM-D,汉密尔顿,1967)。次要结果指标是贝克抑郁量表(BDI; Beck,Steer,&Brown,1996)以及社会功能和生活质量的指标。结果:在整个样本以及一个治疗部位,MBCT在减轻抑郁症状方面均不比TAU有效,尽管在其他治疗部位,MBCT明显优于TAU。 CBASP在减轻总体样本和两个治疗部位的抑郁症状方面比TAU明显更有效。两种治疗方法仅对社会功能和生活质量产生中小影响。结论:进一步的研究应询问CBASP在该试验中的优越性是否可以由CBASP更加积极,解决问题和人际交往的原因来解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号