首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Epidemiology >Colorectal cancer deaths as determined by expert committee and from death certificate: a comparison. The Minnesota Study.
【24h】

Colorectal cancer deaths as determined by expert committee and from death certificate: a comparison. The Minnesota Study.

机译:由专家委员会和死亡证明确定的大肠癌死亡:比较。明尼苏达州研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

For deaths during the first 13 years of follow-up of the Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study, an expert committee using numerous medical documents, and a nosologist using only the death certificate independently determined whether colorectal cancer caused the death and, if not, whether the disease was present at death. Deaths due to colorectal cancer numbered 318 according to the nosologist and 323 according to the committee, a discrepancy of 1.5%, which is similar in magnitude to that in three previous studies. The nosologist and committee agreed that colorectal cancer caused the death in each of 290 individual cases; they disagreed widely on the number of deaths from other causes but with colorectal cancer. If it is important to know only the gross number of deaths from colorectal cancer, then the death certificate alone appears to be sufficiently accurate; if it is important to know the cause of death of individual subjects or the number dying from other causes but with colorectal cancer, then the expert committee method provides more accurate information.
机译:对于明尼苏达州结肠癌控制研究随访的前13年中的死亡,使用大量医学文献的专家委员会和仅使用死亡证明的疾病学家独立确定结直肠癌是否导致死亡,以及是否导致死亡。该疾病在死亡时存在。根据鼻科医师,大肠癌致死人数为318,委员会为323,差异为1.5%,其幅度与之前的三项研究相似。疾病学家和委员会一致认为,大肠癌在290例个人病例中均导致死亡。他们对其他原因导致的大肠癌死亡人数持广泛异议。如果只知道大肠癌死亡总数很重要,那么仅死亡证明似乎就足够准确;如果重要的是要知道个体受试者的死亡原因或因其他原因死亡但患有大肠癌的人数,那么专家委员会方法将提供更准确的信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号