...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Epidemiology >Agreement between patient interview data on prescription medication use and pharmacy records in those aged older than 50 years varied by therapeutic group and reporting of indicated health conditions
【24h】

Agreement between patient interview data on prescription medication use and pharmacy records in those aged older than 50 years varied by therapeutic group and reporting of indicated health conditions

机译:50岁以上患者的处方药物使用患者访谈数据与药房记录之间的一致性因治疗组和指示的健康状况而异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives: To estimate the agreement between interview-ascertained medication use and pharmacy records among the population aged older than 50 years, and to identify patient-level predictors of discordance. Study Design and Setting: The Irish Longitudinal study on Ageing is representative of community-dwelling adults aged 50 years and older in Ireland. Interview-ascertained medication data from 2,621 participants were linked to pharmacy dispensing records. The kappa statistics measured the agreement between the two sources for 19 therapeutic classes. Logistic regression assessed the effect of patient-level characteristics on survey under- and overreporting of regularly dispensed medications. Results: Agreement was good or very good (κ = 0.64-0.86) for 15 medication classes, and moderate or poor for antiinflammatory and antirheumatic products (κ = 0.54), analgesics (κ = 0.50), psycholeptics (κ = 0.59), and ophthalmologicals (κ = 0.37). Not reporting an indicated health condition, less frequent dispensing, older age, and more medications regularly dispensed were associated with survey underreporting, but results varied by therapeutic class. Memory and cognition were not associated with discordance. Conclusion: Ascertaining medication use via patient interview seems a valid method for most medication classes and also captures nonprescription and supplement use. However, medications applied topically and as needed may be underreported. The source of medication data should be carefully considered when performing pharmacoepidemiological studies.
机译:目的:评估年龄在50岁以上的人群中经访谈确定的用药与药房记录之间的一致性,并确定患者水平的不和谐预测因素。研究设计和设置:爱尔兰纵向老龄化研究代表了爱尔兰50岁及以上的社区居民成年人。来自2,621名参与者的经访谈确定的用药数据与药房配药记录相关联。卡帕统计数据衡量了这两种来源在19种治疗类别中的一致性。 Logistic回归评估了患者水平特征对定期分配药物调查不足和过度报告的影响。结果:15种药物的一致性好或非常好(κ= 0.64-0.86),抗炎和抗风湿药的一致性(κ= 0.54),止痛药(κ= 0.50),精神病学家(κ= 0.59)和中等或差眼科学(κ= 0.37)。没有报告所指示的健康状况,较少的配药次数,较高的年龄和定期配发的更多药物与调查漏报有关,但结果因治疗类别而异。记忆和认知与不和谐无关。结论:通过患者访谈来确定用药似乎是大多数用药类别的有效方法,并且可以捕获非处方药和补充剂。但是,局部和根据需要应用的药物可能会被低估。进行药物流行病学研究时,应仔细考虑药物数据的来源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号