...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology: Official Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacology >Are patients reliable when self-reporting medication use? Validation of structured drug interviews and home visits by drug analysis and prescription data in acutely hospitalized patients.
【24h】

Are patients reliable when self-reporting medication use? Validation of structured drug interviews and home visits by drug analysis and prescription data in acutely hospitalized patients.

机译:使用自我报告的药物时患者是否可靠?通过药物分析和处方数据验证急性住院患者的结构化药物访谈和家访。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The medication history among hospitalized patients often relies on patients' self-reports due to insufficient communication between health care professionals. The aim of the present study was to estimate the reliability of patients' self-reported medication use. Five hundred patients admitted to an acute medical department at a Danish university hospital were interviewed on the day of admission about their recent medication use. Blood samples drawn immediately after admission were screened for contents of 5 drugs (digoxin, bendroflumethiazide, amlodipine, simvastatin, glimepiride), and the results were compared to the patients' self-reported medication history. Information on prescribed drugs dispensed from any Danish pharmacy was collected from nationwide real-time pharmacy records. The authors performed home visits in a subgroup of 115 patients 4 weeks after their discharge. Stored drugs were inspected, and patients were interviewed about their drug use. Additional blood samples were drawn for drug analysis. The median age of included patients was 72 years, and 298 patients (60%) were women. Patients reported use of 3 (median) prescription-only medications (range, 0-14) during the structured interview. The congruence between self-report and drug analysis was high for all 5 drugs measured (all kappa >0.8). However, 9 patients (2%) reported use of drugs that were not detected in their blood samples. In 29 patients (6%), the blood samples contained drugs not reported during the structured interview, but 14 of these drugs were registered in either hospital files or pharmacy records. Overall, the sensitivity of information from hospital files, structured interviews, and pharmacy records in identifying drug users was 87% to 93%, with no significant differences between methods. In conclusion, patients' self-reports are reliable when estimating recent use of cardiovascular and antidiabetic drugs.
机译:由于卫生保健专业人员之间的沟通不足,住院患者的用药史通常取决于患者的自我报告。本研究的目的是评估患者自我报告用药的可靠性。入院当天接受丹麦大学医院急诊科收治的五百例患者近期使用药物的采访。入院后立即抽取的血样中筛选出5种药物(地高辛,苯达氟灭嗪,氨氯地平,辛伐他汀,格列美脲)的含量,并将结果与​​患者自我报告的用药史进行比较。从任何一家丹麦药房配发的处方药信息都是从全国实时药房记录中收集的。作者在出院后4周对115名患者的亚组进行了家访。检查了储存的药物,并就药物使用情况采访了患者。抽取其他血样进行药物分析。纳入患者的中位年龄为72岁,其中298位患者(60%)为女性。患者在结构化访谈中报告使用了3种(中位数)仅处方药(范围0-14)。所报告的所有5种药物的自我报告与药物分析的一致性均很高(所有kappa> 0.8)。但是,有9位患者(占2%)报告使用了血液样本中未检测到的药物。在29名患者中(6%),血液样本中包含在结构化访谈中未报告的药物,但其中14种药物已在医院档案或药房记录中进行了注册。总体而言,医院档案,结构化访谈和药房记录中的信息对识别吸毒者的敏感性为87%至93%,两种方法之间没有显着差异。总之,在估计近期使用心血管和抗糖尿病药物时,患者的自我报告是可靠的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号