...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery >Clinical relevance of radius of curvature error in corneal power measurements after excimer laser surgery.
【24h】

Clinical relevance of radius of curvature error in corneal power measurements after excimer laser surgery.

机译:准分子激光手术后角膜屈光度测量中曲率半径误差的临床相关性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare central and paracentral corneal curvature measurements after myopic excimer laser surgery performed using a large optical zone (OZ) (6.5mm). SETTING: Private practice. METHODS: The mean simulated keratometry (SimK) value, average central power, corneal power of Placido rings 1 to 9 and the average central corneal power over the central 3.0mm (ACCP(3mm)) were measured using a TMS-2 corneal topographer. RESULTS: Forty-two patients (mean correction -5.0 diopters [D]+/-2.2 [SD]) were prospectively enrolled. The mean SimK value (38.82 D+/-1.95) and the mean average central power (38.89+/-2.02 D) were not statistically significantly different, even when the sample was stratified according to the amount of induced correction (lower or higher than -5.00 D). The difference between the central and paracentral measurements was statistically significant when considering the ACCP(3mm), whose mean value was lower than the SimK value in eyes with a myopic correction less than -5.00 D (mean 39.53+/-1.92 D versus 39.67+/-1.82 D) (P=.0013) and in eyes with a myopic correction greater than -5.00 D (37.64+/-1.75 D versus 37.9+/-1.69 D) (P<.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In eyes with a large OZ, the clinical relevance of the radius error was limited, especially with myopic corrections less than -5.00 D. The mean difference between central and paracentral corneal curvature data, although more evident, was still relatively small, even in eyes that were treated for more than -5.00 D of myopia. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
机译:目的:比较近视准分子激光手术后使用大光学区(OZ)(6.5mm)进行的中央和中央角膜曲率测量。地点:私人执业。方法:使用TMS-2角膜地形图仪测量平均模拟角膜曲率(SimK)值,Placido环1至9的平均中心屈光度,角膜屈光度以及中心3.0mm(ACCP(3mm))的平均中心角膜屈光度。结果:前瞻性纳入了42例患者(平均矫正度-5.0屈光度[D] +/- 2.2 [SD])。即使根据诱导校正量(低于或高于-进行分层)对样品进行分层,SimK的平均值(38.82 D +/- 1.95)和平均平均中心强度(38.89 +/- 2.02 D)也没有统计学上的显着差异。 5.00天)。当考虑使用ACCP(3mm)时,中心测量值与中心附近测量值之间的差异具有统计学意义,在近视矫正度小于-5.00 D的眼睛中,其平均值低于SimK值(平均39.53 +/- 1.92 D与39.67+ /-1.82 D)(P = .0013)和近视矫正度大于-5.00 D(37.64 +/- 1.75 D与37.9 +/- 1.69 D的眼睛)(P <.0001)。结论:在OZ较大的眼中,半径误差的临床相关性有限,尤其是在近视矫正度小于-5.00 D的情况下。尽管中央角膜中央和中央角膜曲率数据之间的平均差异虽然比较明显,但仍然相对较小,甚至在治疗超过-5.00 D的近视眼中。财务披露:没有任何作者对所提及的任何材料或方法有财务或所有权利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号