...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery >Phacoemulsification with indocyanine green versus manual expression extracapsular cataract extraction for advanced cataract.
【24h】

Phacoemulsification with indocyanine green versus manual expression extracapsular cataract extraction for advanced cataract.

机译:吲哚菁绿超声乳化与人工表达囊外白内障摘除术治疗晚期白内障。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To compare the outcomes of indocyanine green dye (ICG)-assisted phacoemulsification with manual expression extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) in eyes with advanced cataract.Parkland Memorial Hospital and Dallas Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.In this retrospective study, 72 consecutive cases of advanced or mature cataract extractions performed in a 1-year period were reviewed. Fifty-nine eyes met the inclusion and exclusion criteria; 33 had ICG-assisted phacoemulsification and 26, manual expression ECCE. Preoperative and intraoperative findings and the postoperative outcomes up to 6 months were analyzed.Intraoperative complications included posterior capsule tear with vitreous prolapse in 2 eyes (6.6%) and conversion to manual expression ECCE in 1 eye (3.3%) in the ICG phacoemulsification group. There was no intraoperative complication in the manual expression ECCE group. There were significantly more patients with a best corrected visual acuity of 20/30 or better in the ICG phacoemulsification group than in the manual expression ECCE group at all postoperative periods. The mean logMAR visual acuities were significantly better in the ICG phacoemulsification group at all postoperative intervals. The ICG phacoemulsification group had significantly less postoperative astigmatism. There was no significant difference between the groups in the early postoperative intraocular pressure.Phacoemulsification with ICG led to better postoperative visual acuity and less postoperative astigmatism than manual expression ECCE. Phacoemulsification with ICG was associated with more intraoperative complications than manual expression ECCE; however, the complication rate is comparable to a previously published rate for phacoemulsification performed in a university training program. Phacoemulsification with ICG appears to be a reasonable alternative to manual expression ECCE for advanced cataract.
机译:在美国德克萨斯州达拉斯的帕克兰纪念医院和达拉斯退伍军人事务医学中心,比较吲哚花青绿染料(ICG)辅助超声乳化与手动表达的白内障白内障摘除术(ECCE)的效果。回顾了在一年内进行的72例连续的晚期或成熟白内障摘除病例。五十九只眼睛符合纳入和排除标准; 33例具有ICG辅助的超声乳化术,26例具有手动表达的ECCE。分析了术前和术中的发现以及长达6个月的术后结果.ICG超声乳化术组中,术后并发症包括后囊撕裂伴玻璃体脱垂2眼(6.6%)和转换为人工表达ECCE的1眼(3.3%)。手动表达ECCE组无术中并发症。在所有术后阶段,ICG超声乳化术组的最佳矫正视力比手动表达ECCE组的患者明显多于20/30或更高。在所有术后间隔,ICG超声乳化术组的平均logMAR视力均明显好转。 ICG超声乳化术组术后散光明显减少。术后早期眼内压两组之间无显着差异。ICG超声乳化术比人工表达ECCE术后眼视力更好,术后散光更少。与人工表达ECCE相比,ICG超声乳化术术中并发症更多。但是,并发症发生率与大学公布的超声乳化术中先前发表的比率相当。对于晚期白内障,用ICG超声乳化似乎是手动表达ECCE的合理替代方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号