...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics >Cost comparison of epoetin alpha, epoetin beta and darbepoetin alpha for cancer patients with anaemia in the clinical practice setting*.
【24h】

Cost comparison of epoetin alpha, epoetin beta and darbepoetin alpha for cancer patients with anaemia in the clinical practice setting*.

机译:在临床实践中,贫血的癌症患者的依泊汀α,依泊汀β和达泊泊汀α的成本比较*。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and objective: Cost control is becoming an increasingly important consideration for clinicians when planning how to provide the best treatment for anaemic cancer patients. Administration of erythropoiesis stimulating agents (epoetin alpha, epoetin beta and darbepoetin alpha) has become the standard of care for treatment of anaemia in cancer patients. However, only limited information is available on the economic comparability of epoetin alpha, epoetin beta and darbepoetin alpha, and thus this study was conducted to compare cost per patient of each of these agents for anaemic cancer patients. Methods: All prescriptions of the agents over 1 year were analysed by two Austrian regional public health insurance associations and cost per patient for each agent was calculated from invoicing data. Data from the two regions were combined to obtain total mean drug costs per patient per year. Results and discussion: Analyses showed significantly lower costs for epoetin alpha (euro2743.27) than for darbepoetin alpha (euro3627.98) or epoetin beta (euro3292.28): epoetin alpha vs. darbepoetin alpha (P < 0.0001); epoetin beta vs. darbepoetin alpha (P = 0.0001); epoetin alpha vs. epoetin beta (P = 0.0009). As costs of the three agents in Austria are identical for therapeutically equivalent doses, the higher cost of darbepoetin alpha was believed to be due mainly to longer treatment duration to target haemoglobin level. Conclusion: The finding of a cost difference favouring epoetin alpha over darbepoetin alpha suggests the need for prospective randomized studies comparing efficacy and cost effectiveness of all three agents to obtain more definitive data.
机译:背景和目的:在计划如何为贫血癌症患者提供最佳治疗时,成本控制已成为临床医生越来越重要的考虑因素。促红细胞生成素刺激剂(epoetin alpha,epoetin beta和darbepoetin alpha)的给药已成为治疗癌症患者贫血的护理标准。但是,关于依泊汀α,依泊汀β和达泊泊汀α的经济可比性仅有有限的信息,因此进行本研究的目的是比较贫血癌症患者中每种药物的每位患者的费用。方法:由两个奥地利地区公共健康保险协会分析了1年以上代理商的所有处方,并根据发票数据计算了每个代理商的每位患者费用。合并来自两个地区的数据,以获得每位患者每年的平均药物总成本。结果与讨论:分析表明,依泊汀α(euro2743.27)的成本明显低于达比泊汀α(euro3627.98)或依泊汀β(euro3292.28):依泊汀α与达泊泊汀α(P <0.0001); epoetin beta与darbepoetin alpha(P = 0.0001);依泊汀α与依泊汀β(P = 0.0009)。由于在奥地利,这三种药物的治疗等效剂量的费用相同,因此认为达比泊汀α的费用较高,主要是由于达到目标血红蛋白水平的治疗时间更长。结论:发现赞成依泊汀α优于达比泊汀α的成本差异的发现表明,有必要进行前瞻性随机研究,以比较所有三种药物的功效和成本效益,以获得更确切的数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号