...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics >Treatment persistence: a comparison among patients with schizophrenia who were initiated on atypical antipsychotic agents.
【24h】

Treatment persistence: a comparison among patients with schizophrenia who were initiated on atypical antipsychotic agents.

机译:治疗持久性:使用非典型抗精神病药开始治疗的精神分裂症患者的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Although clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of atypical antipsychotic agents in reducing symptoms of schizophrenia, the likelihood of sustaining control of schizophrenic symptoms may depend on treatment persistence. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we compared treatment persistence between patients who were initiated on risperidone or olanzapine, the two most widely prescribed atypical antipsychotic agents. METHOD: We identified patients with schizophrenia by ICD-9-CM codes (> or =1 inpatient or > or =2 outpatient ICD-9-CM codes > or =7 days apart) between 1 July 1998 and 30 June 1999. We further selected those who were prescribed the target drug during 1 April 1999 through 31 March 2000 provided that they were not on any antipsychotic agents during the prior 6 months. Using event history analysis, we compared the treatment persistence in terms of hazard ratio between olanzapine and risperidone initiators, adjusting for patient's sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Following the initiation of the target drug, more patients switched from risperidone to olanzapine than vice versa. However, among patients with schizophrenia who had comorbid diabetes, there were more patients who made a switch from olanzapine to risperidone; whereas among those who used anxiolytics, there were more patients who switched from risperidone to olanzapine. Finally, olanzapine initiators had decreased hazards of discontinuation by 14% (unadjusted; P < 0.001) and 12% (adjusted; P = 0.002), respectively, than risperidone initiators. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with risperidone, olanzapine seems to be better tolerated by patients as indicated by better treatment persistence. As such, initiation of olanzapine may increase the likelihood of sustaining control of symptoms of schizophrenia. Future research needs to provide a more comprehensive assessment of treatment persistence by considering other antipsychotic agents in the study and developing models to assess treatment persistence and switching as two interdependent competing risks.
机译:背景:尽管临床试验已证明非典型抗精神病药可减轻精神分裂症症状,但持续控制精神分裂症症状的可能性可能取决于治疗的持久性。目的:在本研究中,我们比较了使用利培酮或奥氮平(两种处方最广泛的非典型抗精神病药)治疗的患者之间的治疗持久性。方法:我们在1998年7月1日至1999年6月30日期间,通过ICD-9-CM代码(住院时间>或= 1,或> 2或= 2门诊ICD-9-CM代码>或= 7天)识别出了精神分裂症患者。选择在1999年4月1日至2000年3月31日期间开具目标药物的人,前提是在过去6个月内未服用任何抗精神病药。使用事件历史分析,我们根据奥氮平和利培酮引发剂之间的危险比比较了治疗的持久性,并根据患者的社会人口统计学和临床​​特征进行了调整。结果:靶向药物启动后,从利培酮转用奥氮平的患者多于反之。但是,在患有合并症的精神分裂症患者中,有更多的患者从奥氮平转用利培酮。在使用抗焦虑药的患者中,有更多的患者从利培酮转用奥氮平治疗。最后,奥氮平引发剂的停用风险比利培酮引发剂分别降低了14%(未经调整; P <0.001)和12%(经调整; P = 0.002)。结论:与利培酮相比,奥氮平似乎对患者的耐受性更好,这表明更好的治疗持久性。因此,开始服用奥氮平可能会增加控制精神分裂症症状的可能性。未来的研究需要通过在研究中考虑其他抗精神病药并开发模型来评估治疗持续性和转换为两个相互依赖的竞争风险,从而提供对治疗持续性的更全面评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号