...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical periodontology >Subgingival microbiota of periodontally untreated Mexican subjects with generalized aggressive periodontitis.
【24h】

Subgingival microbiota of periodontally untreated Mexican subjects with generalized aggressive periodontitis.

机译:牙周病未经治疗的墨西哥受试者的牙龈下微生物群,患有广泛性侵袭性牙周炎。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Specific microbial profiles that may distinguish between generalized aggressive-periodontitis (GAgP) and generalized chronic-periodontitis (GCP) have, to date, not been described. The purpose of the present study was to describe the subgingival microbial composition of Mexican subjects with GAgP and compare it with that of individuals with GCP and periodontal health (PH). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-seven subjects with GAgP (n=19), GCP (n=39) and PH (n=19) were selected. Clinical measurements included plaque accumulation, gingival erythema, bleeding on probing, suppuration, pocket depth and attachment level. Up to 28 subgingival plaque samples were obtained from each subject and analysed using the checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization technique. RESULTS: GAgP and GCP subjects harboured significantly higher levels and/or proportion of Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia (levels: p<0.001, proportion: p<0.01), Prevotella nigrescens (p<0.05 levels) and "red" complex species (p<0.001 proportion) than PH subjects. All GAgP subjects were carriers of P. gingivalis and P. nigrescens. No significant differences in any of the 40 microbial species tested were detected between GAgP and GCP subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Our results revealed that the microbial differences between GAgP and GCP subjects were only discrete and none of the bacterial species tested seemed to specifically differentiate the subgingival microbial profile of either periodontitis group.
机译:背景与目的:迄今为止,尚未描述可区分广义侵袭性牙周炎(GAgP)和广义慢性牙周炎(GCP)的特定微生物特征。本研究的目的是描述患有GAgP的墨西哥受试者的龈下微生物成分,并将其与患有GCP和牙周健康(PH)的个体进行比较。材料与方法:选择了77名GAgP(n = 19),GCP(n = 39)和PH(n = 19)的受试者。临床测量包括斑块积聚,牙龈红斑,探查出血,化脓,囊袋深度和附着水平。从每个受试者获得多达28个龈下菌斑样品,并使用棋盘DNA-DNA杂交技术进行分析。结果:GAgP和GCP受试者的牙龈卟啉单胞菌,连翘坦白菌(水平:p <0.001,比例:p <0.01),黑短肠杆菌(p <0.05)和“红色”复杂物种(p <0.001比例)。所有GAgP受试者均为牙龈卟啉单胞菌和黑霉菌的携带者。在GAgP和GCP受试者之间未检测到40种微生物中的任何显着差异。结论:我们的结果表明,GAgP和GCP受试者之间的微生物差异仅是离散的,并且所测试的细菌种类均未明确区分任一牙周炎组的龈下微生物特征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号