...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >The oral neurokinin-1 antagonist aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin--the Aprepitant Protocol 052 Stu
【24h】

The oral neurokinin-1 antagonist aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin--the Aprepitant Protocol 052 Stu

机译:口服神经激肽1拮抗剂aprepitant预防化疗引起的恶心和呕吐:一项多国,随机,双盲,安慰剂对照试验,用于接受大剂量顺铂治疗的患者-Aprepitant协议052 Stu

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: In early clinical trials with patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy, the neurokinin antagonist aprepitant significantly enhanced the efficacy of a standard antiemetic regimen consisting of a type-three 5-hydroxytryptamine antagonist and a corticosteroid. This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study was performed to establish definitively the superiority of the aprepitant regimen versus standard therapy in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients receiving cisplatin > or = 70 mg/m2 for the first time were given either standard therapy (ondansetron and dexamethasone on day 1; dexamethasone on days 2 to 4) or an aprepitant regimen (aprepitant plus ondansetron and dexamethasone on day 1; aprepitant and dexamethasone on days 2 to 3; dexamethasone on day 4). Patients recorded nausea and vomiting episodes in a diary. The primary end point was complete response (no emesis and no rescue therapy) on days 1 to 5 postcisplatin, analyzed by a modified intent-to-treat approach. Treatment comparisons were made using logistic regression models. Tolerability was assessed by reported adverse events and physical and laboratory assessments. RESULTS: The percentage of patients with complete response on days 1 to 5 was significantly higher in the aprepitant group (72.7% [n = 260] v 52.3% in the standard therapy group [n = 260]), as were the percentages on day 1, and especially on days 2 to 5 (P <.001 for all three comparisons). CONCLUSION: Compared with standard dual therapy, addition of aprepitant was generally well tolerated and provided consistently superior protection against CINV in patients receiving highly emetogenic cisplatin-based chemotherapy.
机译:目的:在接受高度呕吐化疗的患者的早期临床试验中,神经激肽拮抗剂aprepitant显着增强了由三型5-羟色胺拮抗剂和皮质类固醇组成的标准止吐方案的疗效。进行了这项多中心,随机,双盲,安慰剂对照的III期研究,以明确确立阿瑞匹坦方案相对于标准疗法在预防化学疗法诱发的恶心和呕吐(CINV)中的优越性。患者和方法:首次接受顺铂≥70 mg / m2的患者接受标准治疗(第1天为恩丹西酮和地塞米松;第2天至第4天为地塞米松)或阿瑞匹坦治疗方案(第天为阿瑞匹坦加恩丹西酮和地塞米松) 1;阿瑞吡坦和地塞米松在第2至3天;地塞米松在第4天)。患者在日记中记录了恶心和呕吐发作。主要终点是顺铂后第1至5天的完全缓解(无呕吐和无急救疗法),并采用改良的“意向治疗”方法进行了分析。使用逻辑回归模型进行治疗比较。通过报告的不良事件以及物理和实验室评估来评估耐受性。结果:阿瑞吡坦组在第1至5天完全缓解的患者百分比显着更高(标准治疗组[n = 260]为72.7%[n = 260] vs 52.3%), 1,尤其是在第2至5天(所有三个比较的P <.001)。结论:与标准双重疗法相比,添加阿瑞匹坦的耐受性一般良好,并且在接受高度致呕性顺铂化疗的患者中,对CINV的耐受性始终如一。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号