首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Aprepitant, granisetron, and dexamethasone for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting after high-dose melphalan in autologous transplantation for multiple myeloma: Results of a randomized, placebo-controlled phase III Trial
【24h】

Aprepitant, granisetron, and dexamethasone for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting after high-dose melphalan in autologous transplantation for multiple myeloma: Results of a randomized, placebo-controlled phase III Trial

机译:阿瑞吡坦,格拉司琼和地塞米松在多发性骨髓瘤自体移植中预防大剂量美法仑后化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的发生:一项随机,安慰剂对照的Ⅲ期临床试验的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose The optimal regimen to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) for patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is unclear. To evaluate the effect of aprepitant in addition to a standard regimen, we conducted this randomized, placebo-controlled phase III trial.Patients and Methods Patients with multiple myeloma were randomly assigned at a one-to-one ratio to receive either aprepitant (125 mg orally on day 1 and 80 mg orally on days 2 to 4), granisetron (2 mg orally on days 1 to 4), and dexamethasone (4 mg orally on day 1 and 2 mg orally on days 2 to 3) or matching placebo, granisetron (2 mg orally on days 1 to 4), and dexamethasone (8 mg orally on day 1 and 4 mg orally on days 2 to 3). Melphalan 100 mg/m2 was administered intravenously on days 1 to 2. ASCT was performed on day 4. The primary end point (complete response) was defined as no emesis and no rescue therapy within 120 hours of melphalan administration. Quality of life was assessed by modified Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) questionnaire on days -1 and 6.Results Overall, 362 patients were available for the efficacy analysis (181 in each treatment arm). Significantly more patients receiving aprepitant reached the primary end point (58% v 41%; odds ratio [OR], 1.92; 95% CI, 1.23 to 3.00; P = .0042). Absence of major nausea (94% v 88%; OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.09 to 5.15; P = .026) and emesis (78% v 65%; OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.25 to 3.18; P = .0036) within 120 hours was increased by aprepitant. Mean total FLIE score (± standard deviation) was 114 ± 18 for aprepitant and 106 ± 26 for placebo (P < .001).Conclusion The addition of aprepitant resulted in significantly less CINV and had a positive effect on quality of life.
机译:目的目前尚不清楚用于大剂量化疗和自体干细胞移植(ASCT)患者预防化疗引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV)的最佳方案。为了评估除标准治疗方案外阿瑞匹坦的疗效,我们进行了这项随机,安慰剂对照的III期临床试验。患者和方法多发性骨髓瘤患者以一对一的比例随机分配,接受任一阿瑞匹坦(125 mg第1天口服,第2天至第4天口服80 mg),Granisetron(第1至第4天口服2 mg)和地塞米松(第1天口服4 mg,第2至第3天口服2 mg)或相匹配的安慰剂, Granisetron(第1至4天口服2 mg)和地塞米松(第1天口服8 mg,第2至3天口服4 mg)。在第1至2天静脉注射美法仑100 mg / m2。在第4天进行ASCT。主要终点(完全缓解)定义为在美法仑给药后120个小时内无呕吐和抢救疗法。在第-1天和第6天通过改良的功能生活指数-呕吐(FLIE)问卷对生活质量进行评估。结果总体而言,有362例患者可以进行疗效分析(每个治疗组181例)。接受阿瑞匹坦治疗的患者明显更多地达到了主要终点(58%vs 41%;优势比[OR],1.92; 95%CI,1.23至3.00; P = .0042)。无严重恶心(94%vs 88%; OR,2.37; 95%CI,1.09至5.15; P = .026)和呕吐(78%v 65%; OR,1.99; 95%CI,1.25至3.18; P = .0036)在120个小时内增加了aprepitant。阿瑞匹坦的平均FLIE总平均得分(±标准偏差)为114±18,安慰剂为106±26(P <.001)。结论阿瑞匹坦的添加显着降低了CINV,并对生活质量产生积极影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号