首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Clinical trial to assess the relative efficacy of fluorouracil and leucovorin, fluorouracil and levamisole, and fluorouracil, leucovorin, and levamisole in patients with Dukes' B and C carcinoma of the colon: results from National Surgical Adjuvant B
【24h】

Clinical trial to assess the relative efficacy of fluorouracil and leucovorin, fluorouracil and levamisole, and fluorouracil, leucovorin, and levamisole in patients with Dukes' B and C carcinoma of the colon: results from National Surgical Adjuvant B

机译:评估氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸钙,氟尿嘧啶和左旋咪唑以及氟尿嘧啶,亚叶酸和左旋咪唑在结肠癌患者中的相对疗效的临床试验:国家外科手术佐剂B的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of leucovorin-modulated fluorouracil (FU+LV) with that of fluorouracil and levamisole (FU+LEV) or with the combination of FU+LV and levamisole (FU+LV+LEV). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 1989 and December 1990, 2,151 patients with Dukes' B (stage II) and Dukes' C (stage III) carcinoma of the colon were entered onto National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowl Project protocol C-04. Patients were randomly assigned to receive FU+LV (weekly regimen), FU + LEV, or the combination of FU+LV+LEV. The average time on study was 86 months. RESULTS: A pairwise comparison between patients treated with FU+LV or FU+LEV disclosed a prolongation in disease-free survival (DFS) in favor of the FU+LV group (65% v 60%; P =.04); there was a small prolongation in overall survival that was of borderline significance (74% v 70%; P =.07). There was no difference in the pairwise comparison between patients who received FU+LV or FU+LV+LEV for either DFS (65% v 64%; P =.67) or overall survival (74% v 73%; P =.99). There was no interaction between Dukes' stage and the effect of treatment. CONCLUSION: In patients with Dukes' B and C carcinoma of the colon, treatment with FU+LV seems to confer a small DFS advantage and a borderline prolongation in overall survival when compared with treatment with FU+LEV. The addition of LEV to FU+LV does not provide any additional benefit over and above that achieved with FU+LV. These findings support the use of adjuvant FU+LV as an acceptable therapeutic standard in patients with Dukes' B and C carcinoma of the colon.
机译:目的:比较亚叶酸调节的氟尿嘧啶(FU + LV)与氟尿嘧啶和左旋咪唑(FU + LEV)或与FU + LV和左旋咪唑(FU + LV + LEV)组合的疗效。患者与方法:在1989年7月至1990年12月之间,将2151例杜克斯B型(II期)和杜克C型(III期)结肠癌患者纳入了国家外科手术辅助乳腺和碗计划C-04。患者被随机分配接受FU + LV(每周方案),FU + LEV或FU + LV + LEV的联合治疗。平均学习时间为86个月。结果:接受FU + LV或FU + LEV治疗的患者之间的成对比较显示,无病生存期(DFS)延长,有利于FU + LV组(65%vs 60%; P = .04);总生存期有小幅延长,具有重要意义(74%对70%; P = .07)。接受FU + LV或FU + LV + LEV的DFS(65%v 64%; P = .67)或总生存期(74%v 73%; P = .99)的成对比较之间没有差异)。杜克斯分期与治疗效果之间没有相互作用。结论:与FU + LEV相比,FU + LV治疗似乎在结肠癌Duke's B和C患者中具有较小的DFS优势和总体生存的临界延长。在FU + LV中添加LEV并不会提供超过FU + LV所实现的好处。这些发现支持FU + LV佐剂作为结肠Dukes'B和C癌患者可接受的治疗标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号